Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New York Real Estate Law ReporterColumns & DepartmentsLandlord Tenant LawLitigation

Real Property Law

By ssalkin
August 01, 2018

No Easement Created

New York Land Development Corp. v. Bennett

Grant Created Valid and Alienable Possibility of Reverter

NJCB Spec-1, LLC v. Budnik

Comment

A right of reacquisition — but not a possibility of reverter — was rendered void under the common law upon any attempt to assign it, until the legislature enacted EPTL §6-5.1 in 1966, classifying all future interests as descendible, devisable and alienable. In 265 A.D.2d 286, the court held that the grantor's right to reacquisition became void upon its conveyance to a third party in 1893, which concurrently extinguished the restrictions on the grantee's property. By comparison, in 8 A.D.2d 405, the Fourth Department held that the grantors' interest in a possibility of reverter in a strip of land was fully alienable. The court cited modern texts on real property law and decisions from other states. In general, the use of durational language in a conveyance signals that the transferor has retained a possibility of reverter which automatically terminates the transferee's interest upon the occurrence of the specified limitation. In 149 N.Y.S.2d 887, the court held that the grantor retained a possibility of reverter in his land, as the deed stated that the property interest will be held by the grantee “so long as it shall be necessary for school purposes.” In holding that grantor retained a possibility of reverter, the court emphasized that the language limited the duration during which the grantee would retain the estate and designated the time the estate would revert to the grantor. Similarly, in 28 N.Y.S.2d 262, the Second Department held that the grantors held a possibility of reverter in a deed containing the language “so long as the Railroad Company shall continue to use the said land for its said railroad,” as the words “so long as” created an appropriate durational term to construe a possibility of reverter. Furthermore, the deed did not contain any condition or express provision for re-entry. By contrast, when a grant contains language of condition, courts have held that the grantor has retained a right of reacquisition, which entitles the grantor to enter and terminate the grantee's estate upon failure to perform the condition. In 16 A.D.2d 82, the court held that despite the deed containing the durational word “whenever,” the deed's dominant conditional language showed the grantor's intent to create a condition subsequent, and thus to retain a right of reacquisition. The court stated that the deed contained the “effective formulae” to create a condition subsequent, as it required the land to be “subject to the following conditions and reservations” of being used for school and meeting purposes.

Contract Vendee Entitled to Specific Performance

Carpenter v. Crespo

Questions of Fact About Scope of Mortgage

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Cao

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.