Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the summer, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an amended opinion affirming the denial of a new trial motion and an order denying rehearing en banc in Williams v. Gaye, 15-56880. We now consider whether the final affirmance of the jury verdict in favor of Marvin Gaye's heirs is likely to wreak havoc on musical creativity as some, including the dissent, have argued. For us, the short answer is no.
From the time that lawyers for Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke commenced a declaratory judgment action — in response to a claim letter from attorneys for the heirs of Marvin Gaye alleging that Gaye's 1977 hit “Got to Give It Up” was infringed by the Williams and Thicke's via the 2013 best-selling single “Blurred Lines” — a public debate has unfolded parallel to developments in court.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.