Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Kirchner v. Bernard, NYLJ 6/1/18, p. 22., col. 1, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In creditor's action to set aside an assignment of the right to purchase a co-op apartment at an insider's price, assignees appealed from Supreme Court's award of judgment to creditor. The Appellate Division reversed and granted summary judgment to assignees, holding that assignment was not fraudulent.
The building in which the subject apartment is located was converted to co-operative ownership in 1981. At that time, the current occupants of the apartment did not purchase he apartment, so the shares were allocated to the sponsor. In 1990, the occupant, Vera, brought a declaratory judgment action against the sponsor and the co-op board, seeking to enforce a contract to purchase the apartment at an insider's price. The board objected to the sale because of Vera's failure to provide information about her financial stability. The parties entered into a settlement agreement by the terms of which Vera assigned all of her rights in the contract to her niece's husband. A few months later, creditors obtained judgment against Vera in the amount of $400,000. That judgment has not been satisfied. Creditors then sought to set aside the assignment of contract rights as a fraudulent conveyance. Supreme Court granted judgment to the creditors, and the assignee appealed.
In reversing, the Appellate Division emphasized the testimony of the assignee's witnesses, who emphasized that the assignment was a means of enabling the conveyance of the shares to the nephew while extinguishing Vera's claims against the co-op corporation. The court noted that the creditors had submitted no proof rebutting that testimony, and concluded that their contention that Vera would have prevailed in the action against the co-operative was speculative. As a result the court held that the fraudulent conveyance claim should be dismissed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.