Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The entertainment industry is intensely focused on data collection and analytics as it seeks to maximize the exploitation of digital content. Just as those of us in the privacy field had begun to have a slight breather as much of the heavy lifting on the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was finally behind us, lawmakers in California have passed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA).
The CCPA, which will take effect on Jan. 1, 2020, will require companies that process the personal data of residents of California to observe restrictions on data monetization, provide for data subject rights that are similar to those found in the GDPR, update their privacy policies and to take steps to protect against the possibility of penalties and liquidated damages.
The CCPA will apply to all companies, wherever located in the world, that receive personal data from California residents if they or their parent company or a subsidiary: has annual gross revenues in excess of $25 million; obtains personal information of 50,000 or more California residents, households or devices annually; or obtains 50% or more annual revenue from selling California residents' personal information.
The CCPA defines personal information very broadly, expanding the existing definition to include any data that relates to or can be associated with a particular consumer, including: contact information; online identifiers; government ID numbers; purchase history and other commercial data; biometric information; browsing/search history; sensory, geolocation, professional, employment or education data; and any data used “to create a profile reflecting preferences, characteristics, … behavior, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes.”
Like the GDPR, the CCPA provides data subjects with a number of privacy rights, including:
The CCPA creates a private right of action with the potential to recover damages of $100 to $750 for each affected consumer, exposing companies to an enhanced risk of class actions and costly litigation. In addition, companies will violate the CCPA if they fail to cure within 30 days of receiving notice from the state attorney general. Such violations will be subject to civil penalties of up to $2,500 per violation. Intentional violations can result in civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation. The attorney general could seek to multiply penalties by the number of affected consumers and/or the number of days the violation occurred.
Although compliance is not required until January 2020, it's not too early for entertainment companies to take some concrete steps to take right now:
*****
Jacqueline Klosek is a counsel in Goodwin Procter's business law department and a member of its intellectual property group as well as its privacy and cybersecurity practice. Her practice focuses on transactions involving technology and intellectual property, and she regularly advises clients on various issues related to privacy and data security. She is a key contributor to Goodwin's Founders Workbench, an online resource for startups, emerging companies and the entrepreneurial community. Klosek drafts and negotiates various technology agreements and advises on different aspects of the law related to intellectual property and technology. She also advises clients on various issues related to privacy and data security.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.