Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Politics aside, various regions and industries throughout the country were certain to be impacted differently by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the Jobs Act). Of the numerous provisions of the Jobs Act, perhaps the most publicized was the reduction in tax rates. Most significantly the corporate tax rate was cut from 35% to 21%.
While many groups applauded the cut, the shopping center industry had immediate reasons to be concerned. Numerous shopping center developers use a “layer-cake” of financing, including state and federal tax incentives to reduce the costs of debt and equity financing. The industry correctly saw that the market value of the credits would drop once the Jobs Act become effective. Such tax cut could undoubtedly impact the ability of developers to raise equity, certainly for new projects not yet placed in service.
Perhaps intentionally, Congress added a new, and initially little noticed, program by which the shopping center industry could find a supplemental source of equity. Known popularly as “Opportunity Zones,” the Jobs Act authorized each state to designate census tracts within distressed communities where the median family income does not exceed 80% of state median income or which have at least 20% poverty rate. Presumably, there will be a great deal of overlap among Opportunity Zones and neighborhoods where redevelopment projects can be undertaken with various state and municipal tax incentives.
The statutory provisions creating the program contain the following key components:
Obviously, the benefits from such a statute come with restrictions and obligations. The first is that the investment must be in a business in an Opportunity Zone. The Zones have been selected by each state and are being certified by the United States Treasury Department. The additional key requirements are the following:
In addition, there are certain other requirements of a more detailed nature, and benefits may be lost for failure to comply with the requirements. Furthermore, permitted projects exclude golf courses; country clubs; massage, hot tub or sun tan facilities; or gambling facilities.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?