Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Business Crimes Hotline
Utah Biodiesel Executives in $511 Million Fuel Tax Credit Scheme
On Aug. 24, 2018, two senior executives of Washakie Renewable Energy (WRE) were indicted in the U.S. District of Ohio on felony charges of fraud and money laundering. Jacob Kingston, the Chief Executive Officer of WRE, and his brother, Isaiah Kingston, the Chief Financial Officer, were accused of receiving over half a billion dollars in renewable fuel tax credits from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that they were not entitled to. Founded in 2007, WRE, a biofuels and chemicals company headquartered in Salt Lake City, UT, is jointly owned by Jacob and Isaiah, each having a 50% interest.
Over a six-year period (from 2010 – 2016), the Kingston brothers, along with Lev Aslan Dermen, owner of NOIL Energy Group, a fuel company headquartered in California, were accused of filing false claims for IRS refundable fuel tax credits for biofuel that WRE never produced. The goal of the IRS's program is to boost the use of biodiesel renewable fuel. To facilitate the scheme, Jacob and Isaiah fabricated various documents, including invoices for sales — said to have been taking place in the United States and abroad — along with accounting records. The proceeds were allegedly funneled through Derman's company. Further, the individuals were also charged with laundering a portion of the proceeds through real estate (a multi-million dollar home) and luxury automobile (a 2010 Bugatti Veyron) transactions.
The charges against Jacob and Isaiah resulted from evidence obtained during a February 2016 IRS raid on the Kingston family businesses. Prosecutors also claim that, in advance of this raid, the Kingstons learned of the government's search warrant and destroyed a significant amount of evidence.
Following an appearance before a federal magistrate judge, the brothers pleaded not guilty and were ordered to remain in Weber County Jail pending trial, based partly on concerns that they (and their family members) may flee to Turkey. Documents made available by prosecutors indicated that approximately $134 million was wired to a Turkish bank and the brothers had recently returned from a trip to Turkey, where they purchased a residence. Both Jacob and Isaiah pleaded not guilty. If convicted, the brothers could face decades in prison, in addition to monetary penalties, including restitution.
— Colleen Snow, Mayer Brown
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.