Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Email was first introduced into the workplace more than 30 years ago — and the platform quickly became the de facto way for colleagues to communicate and share data, documents, and information among one another. With the mass adoption of smartphones and devices, email is one of the easiest and quickest ways to communicate.
Specifically, in the legal community, professionals have embraced the tool — coming in directly behind healthcare as the industry that leverages email the most for sending and sharing information. However, as increasing concerns and regulations around data security continue to evolve, the future of digital communication via email may not meet the more stringent requirements.
Trust, in the legal industry, has become the foundation between maintaining relationships between lawyers and their clients. But, with the increase of cyber hacks, phishing, and mistakes — such as accidentally sending information to the wrong person — the conveniences of email are putting the most sensitive data, and client confidentiality at risk.
Today, most law firms recognize this issue, and there's been a major increase in investment in solutions that provide security, encryption and auditing. But while many firms have deployed secure messaging systems and secure file transfer tools to help protect external communication and documents, a recent survey by Biscom shows the downside of those investments.
The report reveals that 88% of firms invest in data protection with secure information and sharing tools. However, a whopping 80% of legal employees admitted to using insecure email to share sensitive data, including private client information such as medical and financial data. Additionally, the survey found that a majority of legal employees didn't even know using email to share confidential information was a problem. In fact, 69% of legal employees believed that email was actually a secure way to share information, and 50% use whatever is easiest to share confidential data, with 75% believing email to be the easiest method.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.