Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In August, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) lost its appeal in United States v. Hoskins, No. 16-1010, — F.3d —-, 2018 WL 4038192 (2d Cir. Aug. 24, 2018). According to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the case turned on the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and whether “a foreign national who never set foot in the United States or worked for an American company during the alleged scheme, may be held liable, under a conspiracy or complicity theory, for violating FCPA provisions targeting American persons and companies and their agents, officers, directors, employees, and shareholders, and persons physically present within the United States.” The Second Circuit continued: “In other words, can a person be guilty as an accomplice or a co-conspirator for an FCPA crime that he or she is incapable of committing as a principal?”
Officers, directors, employees, and shareholders of foreign companies are subject to the FCPA if they: are U.S. citizens, nationals, or residents; commit any act in furtherance of an FCPA while in the United States or by using the facilities of interstate commerce; or engage in conduct that violates the FCPA while acting as an agent of an entity or individual covered by the FCPA. Historically, the DOJ and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission have pursued limited United States touch points as the jurisdictional basis for FCPA enforcement, including, for example, emailing, texting, and virtual participation in meetings from within the United States.
Hoskins, a citizen of the United Kingdom, was originally charged in 2013 for FCPA (and money laundering) violations in connection with hiring third parties to make illicit payments to government officials in Indonesia in order to secure a $118 million contract on behalf of Alstom. In addition to the agency theory of liability, the government alleged that, because Hoskins had the authority to approve and authorize corrupt payments — and did so by emailing and calling Alstom U.S. co-conspirators located in the United States — he could be guilty as a foreign national that aided and abetted FCPA violations. Based in France, Hoskins had not, however, physically traveled to the United States to facilitate the bribery scheme. Two years later, in 2015, the United States District Court in Connecticut held that Hoskins could not be prosecuted under the DOJ's jurisdictional theory and dismissed the FCPA charge against him. In affirming the lower court's ruling, the Second Circuit held that the government could proceed only by demonstrating that Hoskins acted as an agent of a “domestic concern” or was physically present in the United States. Accordingly, the Second Circuit, concluded that the text, structure, and legislative history of the FCPA meant that Hoskins, a non-United States resident, had not acted in furtherance of the bribery scheme while in the country.
The DOJ is continuing to pursue FCPA charges based on agency principles.
— Colleen Snow, Mayer Brown
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.