Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Update on UK Sanctions, Anti-Money Laundering and Brexit

By André Bywater and Jonathan Armstrong
October 01, 2018

While it is typically more likely that cybersecurity issues are handled as a separate compliance function within an organization to the anti-money laundering and sanctions function(s), the cybersecurity function should not act within a vacuum; all of these functions ultimately also have the similar goal of protecting system integrity.

For example, in a given set of circumstances in the event of a cybersecurity incident affecting a financial institution, a regulator will likely need to be satisfied that the sanctions and anti-money laundering teams have robust knowledge, capacity, experience and training in dealing with cybersecurity issues. The respective cybersecurity, sanctions and anti-money laundering teams therefore need to work together, including as regards the teams providing each other practical skills and knowledge.

As is well known, the United Kingdom (UK) is set to leave the EU as of March 2019 under a process more colloquially known as Brexit. Among the significant number of legal and compliance areas that will be affected are sanctions and anti-money laundering. This article provides a brief education about where things currently stand in the UK as regards to sanctions and anti-money laundering in the shifting sands of the Brexit process.

|

What Is Meant By Sanctions?

Sanctions are applied in a variety of situations and are sometimes divided into:

  • Those which restrict trade and business (also known as embargoes) regarding certain countries — embargoes often impose prohibitions or licensing requirements; and
  • Those in the sphere of finance, which restrict dealings in money and providing financial services and funds to certain countries, individuals or entities.

In the UK, sanctions may affect organizations in different ways. For example, criminal offenses may be committed if financial dealings are undertaken with certain entities or individuals, or businesses may be asked to provide information about their accounts or assets. Offenses may also be committed for failing to report breaches of sanctions.

|

Will Brexit Have an Impact?

In a word, yes. Sanctions and anti-money laundering are currently very much EU-based and driven — anti-money laundering legislation comes from the EU and sanctions are essentially centralized at the EU level, albeit run nationally at the enforcement level. Therefore Brexit will have a major impact, notably in enforcement.

Under the Brexit process, the UK has already been busy putting in place its own legislation in a number of areas, which it specifically did in May 2018 to be able to deal post-Brexit as regards both sanctions and money laundering under the UK's Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (SAMLA 2018). The main provisions of SAMLA 2018 will come into force in 2019, probably around the time the UK is formally expected to leave the EU. Under this newly legislated regime, the UK has already adopted its own particular approach in some respects; for example sanctions (in the form of an asset freeze) may be adopted on individuals by description rather than by specific name.

The purpose of SAMLA 2018 is to ensure that once the UK has left the EU that it can continue to impose, update and lift sanctions provided for by the United Nations (UN) and pursuant to other international obligations, and effectively detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing (including by implementing internationally recognized standards).

Under SAMLA 2018, UK government ministers will have the power to make (separate) sanctions regulations as follows:

  • To comply with a UN or other international regulation; or
  • To achieve one of a number of so-called defined “discretionary purposes” including preventing terrorism, promoting national and international peace and security, and responding to gross human rights violations.

Where a UK government minister seeks to introduce sanctions regulations for a discretionary purpose, they must be satisfied that:

  • The purpose of the measure is one permitted under SAMLA 2018;
  • There are good reasons to pursue that purpose; and
  • The imposition of sanctions is a reasonable course of action for achieving that purpose.

This power will enable the UK to continue to comply with its evolving international obligations and to use sanctions to meet challenging foreign policy and national security objectives post-Brexit. The different types of sanctions that can be imposed are set out and explained in SAMLA 2018 and cover financial, immigration, trade, aircraft, shipping and other sanctions. In territorial terms, SAMLA 2018 will be enforceable against those within the UK and also UK individuals abroad.

UK government ministers also have powers under SAMLA 2018 to make further separate legislation (in the form of so-called Regulations) for the purposes of enabling or facilitating the detection, investigation or prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. These wide-ranging powers will allow a minister to make, amend and repeal secondary legislation to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing post-Brexit to ensure that the UK can continue to comply with standards set by the inter-governmental body The Financial Action Task Force and deal with emerging risks relating to money laundering and terrorist financing.

SAMLA 2018 certainly allows for more flexibility to impose sanctions and may see the UK diverging from the EU's approach to sanctions. On the same theme, it will also remain to be seen as to how the EU deals with sanctions post-Brexit, i.e., whether the EU chooses any differences in approach to dealing with sanctions — it is widely acknowledged that that the UK has contributed significantly in the past in EU sanctions matters such as with intelligence-gathering on sanctioned individuals.

|

The EU 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive

The Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD5) was adopted by the EU Council on May 14, 2018 and came into force on July 9, 2018. EU Member States must implement it into national law by Jan. 10, 2020.

AMLD5 introduces significant changes to the EU's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing regime. More specifically, AMLD5 makes various changes to the EU's Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive. In sum, key changes include:

  • The so-called crypto market, for example, all platforms that offer the exchange of a virtual currency like Bitcoin will fall under the scope of AMLD5;
  • Access to information on beneficial ownership is broadened and transparency in the ownership of companies and trusts has been upgraded; and,
  • Enhanced due diligence on transactions involving high-risk third countries will need to be made.

The UK government has confirmed that it will implement AMLD5 before it leaves the EU. It has said that it will transpose the new rules into law as the January 2020 adoption deadline falls within the post-Brexit implementation period that was agreed in principle between UK and EU earlier this year. More specifically the UK Government has said the following:

“The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 already require all express trusts (including those administered from outside the UK) which generate a UK tax consequence — such as when property held within the trust is purchased or sold – to register details of their beneficial ownership with HMRC. Information on this register is accessible to UK law enforcement. All such trusts, and all UK express trusts, are also required to maintain written, accurate and up-to-date records of their beneficial ownership and make these available to UK law enforcement upon request. The Fifth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD) will expand the scope of the existing registration requirement to include all express trusts, and non-EU trusts which acquire real estate within the EU, with persons with a legitimate interest in information on the register having a right of access to it. The transposition deadline for this Directive will be in January 2020. As this falls within the Implementation Period on which the UK and EU reached agreement earlier this year, the UK will transpose this Directive. This will further strengthen the ability of UK law enforcement to access information on the beneficial ownership of trusts with a connection to the UK.”

|

Conclusion: Moving Forward

The upshot regarding SAMLA 2018 is that organizations will need to have compliance processes, procedures and policies in place to be able to deal with sanctions in the UK post-Brexit. This will include policies to try to identify clients falling with a given description, which may prove challenging. They will also still need to manage the EU process — there may well be situations where both UK and EU sanctions apply, e.g., where UK nationals or UK entities are operating in the EU.

Cybersecurity will also be practically impacted, including with regard to preparation for compliance with 5AMLD, which will in effect require the introduction of cybersecurity measures, such as regards technical requirements that will need to be introduced or adapted and tested, for example concerning access controls.

Accordingly, an organization's respective cybersecurity, anti-money laundering and sanction teams will need to work together.

*****

André Bywater and Jonathan Armstrong are commercial lawyers with Cordery in London, UK, where they focus on regulatory compliance, processes and investigations. Reach them at [email protected] and [email protected], respectively.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.