Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By Collen Snow
November 01, 2018

Petrobras Pays $853.2 Million to U.S. and Brazil Authorities to Settle FCPA Charges

In March 2014, Brazilian authorities launched an investigation known as Operation Car Wash (or Lava Jato in Portuguese). Operation Car Wash initially began as a money laundering investigation of black market money dealers (doleiros), who used small businesses to launder criminal profits. As the investigation developed, Operation Car Wash uncovered pervasive corruption and bribery at Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), the Brazilian state-owned oil company. The doleiros acted on behalf of — and at the direction of — Petrobras managers and executives (including members of the Board of Directors) who overpaid on contracts with companies, in order to funnel a percentage of deals to slush funds for politicians and political parties and keep the officials in power within Petrobras. To-date, hundreds of legislators, governors, mayors, political bosses, and business executives — including the former president — have been implicated, arrested, and/or convicted as part of the scheme in which billions of dollars in improper payments are suspected to have been made.

The Sept. 27, 2018, global settlement resolves charges with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) developed as part of the U.S. government's investigation into Petrobras — working in close collaboration with the Brazilian authorities. This resolution follows the December 2016 resolution where Odrebrecht S.A. and Braskem S.A. pleaded guilty to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations related to Operation Car Wash. As a result, the two Brazilian companies agreed to pay $3.6 billion in monetary penalties to authorities in the United States, Brazil, and Switzerland.

The Petrobras three-year Non-Prosecution Agreement with the DOJ reflects a reduction in the monetary penalty consistent with the company's significant remediation and its cooperation after learning of the allegations of misconduct, albeit without voluntary disclosure.

Likewise, Petrobras also reached a settlement with the SEC. The Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings calls for a monetary penalty of $853 million, for a total of $933 million, including disgorgement and prejudgment interest to be paid by Petrobras in connection with the SEC resolution. This amount will be reduced based on any payments made by Petrobras to a settlement fund for a class action in the Southern District of New York. Brazil will receive 80% of the $853 million ($682,560,000), with DOJ and SEC receiving 10% ($85,320,000) each.

 

Collen Snow, Mayer Brown

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.