Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Some of the most overlooked sections in a lease for a retail shopping center are the insurance provisions. Even experienced asset managers and general counsel often have a number of questions surrounding insurance provisions in shopping center leases. Despite their seemingly lackluster nature, well-drafted insurance provisions in a contract between a landlord and tenant can be extremely important when it comes to mitigating potential exposure and protecting a shopping center's assets.
Nearly every shopping center lease agreement contains provisions requiring the tenant to procure and maintain liability insurance for itself continuously throughout the term of the agreement. There is significant protection for a landlord in having its retail tenants bound by lease provisions that require the tenants to maintain insurance coverage for themselves.
It is prudent for a landlord to spell out each type of insurance coverage it requires its retail tenant to maintain. First and foremost, a landlord has an interest in making sure its tenant has commercial general liability insurance that will cover both bodily injury and property damage. If a customer injured while on the tenant's premises is compensated by the tenant's policy, this reduces the exposure for a claim against the property owner.
Many leases further require the retail tenant to maintain workers' compensation insurance to the full extent required by the applicable law; employer's liability insurance; automobile liability insurance; excess insurance coverage; and even comprehensive cyber liability insurance (as more landlords and tenants are incorporating technology into everyday use). By requiring a retail tenant to insure itself, the landlord is making sure the tenant has protection in the event it is sued and will not necessarily face financial hardship that may negatively affect the tenant's ability to pay rent.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.