Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Oct. 11, 2018, Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, Brian Benczkowski, issued the “Selection of Monitors in Criminal Division Cases” memorandum to “establish standards, policy, and procedures, for the selection of monitors” in U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division cases involving a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), non-prosecution agreement (NPA), or plea bargain between the DOJ and business organizations.
Building on the 2008 memorandum issued by then Acting Deputy Attorney General, Craig Morford (“Selection and Use of monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations”), Benczkowski opens with a discussion of applicable DOJ considerations regarding appointment of a compliance monitor. Specifically, the factors considered by Criminal Division attorneys are as follows:
The memorandum further notes that the DOJ should take monetary costs to the business into account — particularly compared to any potential benefits gained by the monitorship — in addition to “the unique risks and compliance challenges the company faces” in light of its industry and operating jurisdictions.
In the event a corporate compliance monitor is imposed, the memorandum goes onto discuss in detail the compliance monitor selection process, which is broken into six primary components:
Further, the memorandum also briefly touches on internal DOJ approval and consultation requirements; terms required in DPAs, NPAs, and plea agreements related to compliance monitors; and the Standing Committing protocol for DOJ's monitor selection.
The following day, on Oct. 12, 2018, Benczkowski spoke at the New York University Law School Corporate Compliance and Enforcement Conference and touched on, among other DOJ enforcement trends and priorities, appointing compliance monitors and the recently announced guidance. Calling it a “pragmatic approach,” Benczkowski indicated that “the imposition of a corporate monitor is never meant to be punitive,” and that the goal of the new policy is to “ensure that [DOJ will] continue to carefully evaluate each case.” Importantly, Benczkowski also emphasized that “consistent with [DOJ's] longstanding practice of imposing corporate monitors as the exception, not the rule.”
While the “Selection of Monitors in Criminal Division Cases” is largely consistent with earlier DOJ policy and practice, it provides further transparency with respect to the specific factors considered in evaluating whether to impose a corporate compliance monitor.
— Colleen Snow, Mayer Brown
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.