Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Oct. 11, 2018, Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, Brian Benczkowski, issued the “Selection of Monitors in Criminal Division Cases” memorandum to “establish standards, policy, and procedures, for the selection of monitors” in U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division cases involving a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), non-prosecution agreement (NPA), or plea bargain between the DOJ and business organizations.
Building on the 2008 memorandum issued by then Acting Deputy Attorney General, Craig Morford (“Selection and Use of monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations”), Benczkowski opens with a discussion of applicable DOJ considerations regarding appointment of a compliance monitor. Specifically, the factors considered by Criminal Division attorneys are as follows:
The memorandum further notes that the DOJ should take monetary costs to the business into account — particularly compared to any potential benefits gained by the monitorship — in addition to “the unique risks and compliance challenges the company faces” in light of its industry and operating jurisdictions.
In the event a corporate compliance monitor is imposed, the memorandum goes onto discuss in detail the compliance monitor selection process, which is broken into six primary components:
Further, the memorandum also briefly touches on internal DOJ approval and consultation requirements; terms required in DPAs, NPAs, and plea agreements related to compliance monitors; and the Standing Committing protocol for DOJ's monitor selection.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?