Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Case Notes

By Janice Inman
December 01, 2018

Two Lawsuits, No Collateral Estoppel

The District Court of Nassau County, NY, has held that although a landlord was ordered to sell her commercial property to her tenant in accordance with the terms of the parties' lease, the tenant was not entitled to summary dismissal of the landlord's second suit seeking unpaid rent, as the rent claims were for amounts due post-decision and they were not raised or addressed in the prior lawsuit. Carter v. 126 Henry St. Inc., NYLJ, DOI; Pg. 29; Vol. 260, No. 56.

Landlord Betty Cator leased a commercial property in Hempstead, NY, to 126 Henry Sreet Inc., which does business as Village Auto Clinic (Village Auto). Village Auto commenced an action in Nassau County Supreme Court alleging breach of the lease and seeking specific performance of Cater's agreement to sell the property to Village Auto. Cater brought a second suit in response, in which she claimed that Village Auto had not paid its contractually agreed rent. The two lawsuits were joined for trail in Nassau County Supreme Court in March of 2015.

By June of 2015 the matter was still dragging because Cater's attorney was no longer on the case. The court therefore stayed the proceeding for 60 days but also gave Cater a warning that if she failed to appear for the next scheduled conference a default judgment would be entered against her. The court was more generous than that, waiting until Cater had failed to appear three times before entering default judgment for Village Auto by granting it the order for specific performance of the sale contract, to be performed within 90 days of the order. The court simply dismissed the non-payment-of-rent portion of the suit.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.