Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Artificial intelligence and automation are creeping into the workplace of every industry, bringing the added benefits of efficiency and security. As more organizations implement AI solutions across their departments, businesses still relying on outdated, manual processes will fall behind.
Legal departments ranked AI solutions last for their technology needs, according to a survey by HBR Consulting — a surprising finding considering the plethora of administrative tasks legal teams handle, like document editing, work tracking and routing. A recent report by SpringCM found legal is the primary department involved in contracts for 59% of businesses. If other departments use AI to address inefficiencies that take time away from other projects, why are legal teams ignoring the potential of artificial intelligence to transform the contracting process?
While other industries have embraced digital transformation, the legal industry's adherence to tradition has delayed the adoption of new technologies. But relying on legacy tools in rudimentary word processing and manual editing prevents legal teams from reaching their full potential, especially when they have cutting-edge solutions at their fingertips.
As legal departments face stricter industry regulations and tighter bandwidth, their workloads increase, creating pressure to balance business-critical tasks with tedious, routine operations. A core responsibility of law departments is to manage clients' contractual obligations, and if that process is not optimally performed, it can lead to a few problems.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.