Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A lot can change in three years. Back in 2015, President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping stood in the Rose Garden and announced to the world that they had reached an agreement to end state-sponsored cyberattacks to steal trade secrets.
“The question now is, 'Are words followed by actions?'” Obama said at the time.
That handshake between world economic powerhouses hasn't aged well. The U.S. and China are in the midst of an escalating trade war and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has been prosecuting trade misappropriation cases against China with notable vigor as of late.
“I wouldn't say the agreement has gone out the window, but this is a sign that the DOJ is going to take matters into its own hands more, rather than try to get cooperation from the Chinese authorities,” says Dana Finberg, a partner at Arent Fox in San Francisco who specializes in trade secret and patent litigation.
In the past several weeks, the DOJ has pursued charges against Chinese hackers and intelligence officers for allegedly swiping jet engine manufacturing trade secrets. The agency secured indictments accusing three former Genentech employees of stealing trade secrets from the biotech company and handing the info to a Taiwanese competitor planning a Hong Kong IPO. Then it charged a Chinese company with stealing trade secrets from semiconductor company Micron Technology Inc.
China has called the accusations baseless, while the DOJ has announced its “China Initiative” as part of a “strategic priority of countering Chinese national security threats” and to bolster President Donald Trump's “overall national security strategy.”
“It's the first time you have an initiative within the DOJ focused on a particular country,” Finberg notes.
Now-former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a prepared statement prior to his forced resignation on Nov. 7 that “Chinese economic espionage against the United States has been increasing — and it has been increasing rapidly. Enough is enough. We're not going to take it anymore.”
Sessions' departure isn't expected to alter the DOJ's aggressive pursuit of intellectual property thieves, says Ryan Fayhee, partner and leader of the sanctions, export controls and anti-money laundering practice group at Hughes Hubbard & Reed in Washington, DC. Before going into private practice, he spent 11 years prosecuting trade secret theft and espionage cases for the DOJ.
“They may, if anything, be increased,” he says, referring to DOJ trade theft prosecutions. “There's no question at all that there is this really intense focus on China intellectual property theft. You also have the CFIUS law that Congress has passed. It's all related. It's all about China.”
Historically, tension has existed within the DOJ between deciding whether to call out trade theft through criminal prosecution or stay quiet and work behind the scenes to exploit the situation and collect counterintelligence by, for instance, flipping the foreign spy to work as a double agent, according to another former DOJ prosecutor, Jonathan Poling, a partner in Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld's international trade practice in Washington, DC.
But that tension seems to be dissipating, which could explain the recent trade theft prosecution actions — and these cases don't come together overnight. The aforementioned jet engine case stretches back to 2010, for example.
“I imagine that some of these cases have been worked on for years now and there was a policy judgment in the Trump administration that we would start prosecuting these cases,” Poling says.
“I think the sense is on these cases that there's really not much to be learned or gained from an intelligence perspective,” he adds, “and the need for deterrence outweighs whatever value there is to learn from the intelligence efforts that are occurring through the Chinese to acquire U.S. trade secrets.”
While Fayhee believed the DOJ's recent trade theft prosecutions were an instrument of foreign policy, he stressed that DOJ investigators and prosecutors are motivated by the facts of a case, not politics.
“What's happening though is there are enforcement priorities,” he says. “They have, over the past years, focused on China and I think you're seeing increased resources being devoted to those cases. And that's consistent with U.S. national and foreign policy goals.” Finberg, the partner at Arent Fox, echoes Fayhee, saying he believed the DOJ's recent actions on alleged Chinese trade theft were “part and parcel of the Trump administration getting tough on China.”
“It's not as if all the sudden the DOJ has started prosecuting trade secret misappropriation,” he adds. “But there is no doubt that the amount of publicity these cases are getting and the amount of resources being dedicated to these cases has increased significantly.”
*****
Phillip Bantz is a reporter for Corporate Counsel, an ALM sibling of The Intellectual Property Strategist. Follow him on Twitter @PhillipBantz.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.