Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
BPS Lot 3, LLC v. Northwest Bay Partners, Ltd. NYLJ 11/26/18, p. 17, col. 3 Supreme Ct, Warren Cty. (Muller, J.)
In two actions by lot owner in a common interest community, one to foreclose a lien for unpaid assessments and the other to recover a money judgment for the amount of those assessments, the delinquent lot owner moved for summary judgment. The court granted the motion with respect to the action for a money judgment, concluding that the plaintiff lot owner lacked standing, but denied the motion with respect to the action to foreclose a lien, holding that question of fact precluded the grant of summary judgment.
The parties all own parcels in a common interest community on Lake George. All of the lots are subject to a declaration of covenants enforced by a homeowners' association (HOA), a not-for-profit corporation. The Declaration requires each owner to pay annual assessments to the HOA for maintenance and operation of the community, and provides that those obligations shall constitute a lien on each lot. The delinquent owner has, for 17 years, failed to pay assessments relative to each of its 11 lots, contending that it is entitled to offsets for work performed on the subdivision by its sole shareholder. The HOA has filed several liens against the delinquent shareholder's lots, and has commenced settlement discussions, but has not resolved the issues pertaining to the assessments and has not foreclosed on its liens. In 2017, plaintiff lot owner filed notices of lien against several lots owned by the delinquent owner “in the right of' the HOA, and then brought an action to foreclose on those liens. Plaintiff lot owner brought a second action, also “in the right of” the HOA for a money judgment in the amount of the annual assessments allegedly due on other lots owned by the delinquent owner. The delinquent owner sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on a number of grounds, including lack of standing.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?