Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Case Study: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Denies Trustee's Breach of Fiduciary Duty Suit
On Jan. 22-25, 2018, a bench trial occurred in Gary F. Seitz, Chapter 7 Trustee of Covenant Partners, L.P. v. William B. Fretz, Jr. and John P. Freeman (In re Covenant Partners, L.P.), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156652 (E.D. Pa. 9/13/18) (Seitz), an adversary proceeding in In re Covenant Partners, L.P., No. 14-17568-SR, Bankr. E.D. Pa. in which the Trustee of Debtor, Covenant Partners, L.P., sued for breach of fiduciary duty.
Covenant was a limited partnership founded by Defendants in 1996. It had 58 limited partners and operated from Keystone Equities Group, L.P., an affiliated broker-dealer. Keystone provided Covenant with office space, support and broker-dealer services. Covenant's Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) was governed by the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the Act). It granted the General Partner broad authority, to borrow and secure borrowings with Covenant's property.
Covenant owned 8 million shares of common stock in Pet360, Inc., a startup that sold pet food, supplies and services on line. John Freeman was on Pet360's Board from the 1990's until 2014. Pet360's stock was private and restricted. From 2008 until 2010, Keystone experienced difficulties. To preserve Keystone, Covenant lent $1.2 million to Keystone (the Loan Advances).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
"Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight
The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.