Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Huyck v. 171 Tenants Corp. NYLJ 12/4/18, p. 21, col. 1 Supreme Ct., N.Y. Cty (Kalish, J.)
In an action by co-op unit owners for a judgment declaring that they have an exclusive right to the roof terraced adjacent to their apartment, unit owners moved for summary judgment. The court granted the motion, holding that the proprietary lease established unit owners' exclusive right to the rooftop space.
Unit owners purchased a penthouse apartment in 1999 and have occupied it as part-time residents ever since. The apartment adjoins the northern half of the building's roof space; no other apartment adjoins that space, and the only other access is through a door with a sign stating “Emergency Exit Only. Alarm will Sound. Push Here.” When unit owners purchased the apartment, they spent $100,000 to renovate the apartment. The renovations were done pursuant to an agreement with the co-op corporation. On sporadic occasions, the doorman gave the key to the roof deck to other unit owners, generally when the owner of the penthouse apartment was not at home. When someone was at home, the doorman would call up before sending anyone to the roof deck. In 2016, however, the co-op corporation placed a table on the roof deck, and the following year, the corporation destroyed a rock garden tended by unit owners Unit owners then brought this action seeking declaratory relief.
In awarding summary judgment to unit owners, the court relied on the language of the proprietary lease, which provides that “if the apartment includes … a portion of the roof adjoining a penthouse, the Lessee shall have and enjoy the exclusive use of … that portion of the roof appurtenant to the penthouse ….” The court noted that other courts have construed the same language to give an exclusive use right to the unit owner whose apartment adjoins the roof. The court also rejected the argument that unit owners had waived their exclusive right by allowing other units owners to use the deck, concluding that unit owners had not abandoned their exclusive right to use the space. The court also held that the other buildings resident had not established an adverse possession claim.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.