Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Huyck v. 171 Tenants Corp. NYLJ 12/4/18, p. 21, col. 1 Supreme Ct., N.Y. Cty (Kalish, J.)
In an action by co-op unit owners for a judgment declaring that they have an exclusive right to the roof terraced adjacent to their apartment, unit owners moved for summary judgment. The court granted the motion, holding that the proprietary lease established unit owners' exclusive right to the rooftop space.
Unit owners purchased a penthouse apartment in 1999 and have occupied it as part-time residents ever since. The apartment adjoins the northern half of the building's roof space; no other apartment adjoins that space, and the only other access is through a door with a sign stating “Emergency Exit Only. Alarm will Sound. Push Here.” When unit owners purchased the apartment, they spent $100,000 to renovate the apartment. The renovations were done pursuant to an agreement with the co-op corporation. On sporadic occasions, the doorman gave the key to the roof deck to other unit owners, generally when the owner of the penthouse apartment was not at home. When someone was at home, the doorman would call up before sending anyone to the roof deck. In 2016, however, the co-op corporation placed a table on the roof deck, and the following year, the corporation destroyed a rock garden tended by unit owners Unit owners then brought this action seeking declaratory relief.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.