Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Department of Justice's (DOJ) investigation into Insurance Corporation of Barbados Limited (ICBL) for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) ended with an Aug. 23, 2018 declination. According to the published declination, the DOJ identified $36,000 in bribes paid by ICBL agents and employees between August 2015 and April 2016 to a Barbadian government official in exchange for insurance contracts. Donville Inniss — then-member of the Parliament of Barbados and the Minister of Industry, International Business, Commerce, and Small Business Development of Barbados — was paid bribes to ensure that ICBL was awarded two government insurance contracts. Inniss then hid the ICBL bribe money by laundering it through a United States dental office that belonged to his friend. The money flowed through a New York bank account in the name of his friend to a Florida bank account in Inniss's name.
The ICBL declination was the first under the DOJ's November 2017 Corporate Enforcement Policy, which “provid[es] additional benefits to companies based on their corporate behavior once they learn of misconduct,” including a declination when the company satisfies voluntary self-disclosure, full cooperation, and timeline and appropriate remediation. In its declination letter, the DOJ noted ICBL's timely self-disclosure; comprehensive internal investigation; cooperation with the government's investigation; compliance program enhancements; remediation, including terminating ICBL executives/employees involved in the scheme; and identification of culpable employees such that DOJ could pursue and charge these individuals. Pursuant to the Corporate Enforcement Policy, ICBL was required to disgorge $93,940.19, the profits illegally earned as a result of the bribery scheme.
This declination followed a March 2015 indictment in the Eastern District of New York charging Inniss — a U.S. legal permanent resident who resided in Tampa, FL, in addition to Barbados — with one count of conspiracy to launder money and two counts of laundering money related to the bribes he received from ICBL. Inniss was arrested in early August 2018 and pleaded not guilty.
Most recently, on Jan. 28, 2019, the DOJ announced that the former Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President of ICBL were each charged in the Eastern District of New York with one count conspiracy to launder money and two counts of laundering money as part of the same bribery scheme. Per the indictment, then-Chief Executive Officer (Ingrid Inness) and then-Senior Vice President (Alex Tasker) participated in the 2015 — 2016 scheme to launder the $36,000 in bribes they paid to Inniss.
— Colleen Snow, Mayer Brown
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.