Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Strough v. Incorporated Village of West Hampton Dunes NYLJ 12/14/18, p. 28, col. 2 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by the Town of Southampton and the Trustees of the Freeholders of the Town of Southampton for a declaratory judgment that they own land that was previously under water, the town and the trustees appealed from Supreme Court's determination dismissing the complaint as time-barred and denying their motion to dismiss current occupants' counterclaim for adverse possession. The Appellate Division modified to reinstate the complaint, holding that questions of fact precluded summary judgment.
Current occupants own waterfront land in the Incorporated Village of West Hampton Dunes, which is located in the Town of Southampton. From 1973 to 1975 and 1992 to 1993, severe storms caused millions of tons of sand to be washed into Moriches Bay, adjacent to the land of current occupants. As a result, the high water mark of the bay shifted 500 feet northward creating additional land adjacent to current occupants' land. In 2006, the town and the trustees brought this action to establish that they, and not the current occupants, owned this additional land. Current occupants moved to dismiss the complaint based on the statute of limitations and on laches, and counterclaimed to establish title by adverse possession. Supreme Court dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, but held that questions of fact remained with respect to the adverse possession claim. The town and the trustees appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.