When Alice Leaves Software in Wonderland: Review the Terms of Use

That least-read contract — the Terms of Use (ToU) — can be an effective (albeit the last) weapon in the arsenal of a company trying to protect unpatented software technology while providing on-line services. In particular, a Software as a Service (SaaS) company may need to rely on its user license agreement or ToU to protect against theft of its technology by competitors posing as customers. Importantly, as discussed below, the ToU can support injunctive relief just as is available for patent infringement. Furthermore, even where individual components of the SaaS product are otherwise publicly available, or known in the art, a ToU contract protecting the proprietary combination of such components in the product as a whole will be enforced. See, Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257, 99 S. Ct. 1096 (1978) (enforcing contractual obligations freely undertaken at arm's length to continue to pay royalties on unpatented publicly available product).

Protecting Technology

A company may spend millions of dollars and much time and resources developing valuable software technology that implements a novel method of doing something (i.e., reducing an abstract idea to practice). Under Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208,134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014), the Court relying on, Mayo v. Prometheus, 566 U.S. 66, 132 S.Ct. 1289 (2012), found that an abstract idea cannot be patented just because it is implemented on a computer. So, where its software technology may not be patent eligible, the company must resort to other means to protect its investment. One option may be trade secret protection for the software architecture, but that requires the company to have had enough foresight to implement, and adhere to, the practices required to sufficiently protect its trade secrets before the need for enforcement arises.