Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
EU lawmakers have approved controversial new copyright rules that aim to make it easier for content rights-holders to make money when their content is used on digital platforms but could force large platforms such as Google, Facebook and YouTube to make changes to their operations.
The rules also aim to protect the right to make creative use of content online.
After a two-year battle, members of the European Parliament, the EU's legislative assembly, voted 348 in favor, 274 against copyright rules that seek to strengthen the negotiating position of owners of digital content such as films and music with digital platforms such as YouTube and Facebook.
“Today's vote ensures the right balance between the interests of all players — users, creators, authors, press — while putting in place proportionate obligations on online platforms,” the European Commission, which produced the first draft of the rules, said in a statement.
Helen Smith, executive chair of IMPALA, which represents independent record labels, declared the new rules a victory for creators of content.
“This is a landmark day for Europe's creators and citizens, and a significant step towards a fairer internet,” she said. “Platforms facilitate a unique relationship between artists and fans, and this will be given a boost as a result of this directive. It will have a ripple effect worldwide.”
Digital rights campaigners had called on lawmakers to drop part of the legislation that requires platforms to take down unauthorized content, saying it would force them to use crude content filters to guard against illegal content. These filters would automatically delete content for which users had not obtained explicit upload permission, stifling the creative use of digital content online.
Lawmakers rejected these arguments, put forward by Julia Reda, a member of Germany's pro-digital rights Pirate Party. Instead, they backed a range of exceptions that would allow content to be used for parody, quotation and other purposes.
Technology companies such as Google and Facebook had also opposed the copyright overhaul, stating that the changes would require them to build expensive content filters and stop linking to publications.
On March 26, Google issued a statement saying the EU's copyright reforms would produce legal uncertainty and hurt the bloc's creative and digital economies.
“The details matter, and we look forward to working with policymakers, publishers, creators and rights holders as EU member states move to implement these new rules,” the company said.
The new rules mean Google will have to pay fair compensation to publishers, artists and musicians.
Axel Voss, a conservative German lawmaker, said that claims that the new rules would stifle creativity were “complete exaggerations.”
The Commission said that the copyright rules would “protect freedom of expression” by setting “strong safeguards for users.” The use of existing works for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature as well as parody would be explicitly allowed, according to the Commission. “Memes and similar parody creations can be used freely,” it said.
The rules, which need the final approval of the EU's 28 national governments, will come into effect in approximately two years.
*****
Simon Taylor writes for Legal Week, the London-based ALM sibling publication of Entertainment Law & Finance.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.