Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Online Extra: Europe Passes Controversial New Copyright Law

By Simon Taylor
April 01, 2019

EU lawmakers have approved controversial new copyright rules that aim to make it easier for content rights-holders to make money when their content is used on digital platforms but could force large platforms such as Google, Facebook and YouTube to make changes to their operations.

The rules also aim to protect the right to make creative use of content online.

After a two-year battle, members of the European Parliament, the EU's legislative assembly, voted 348 in favor, 274 against copyright rules that seek to strengthen the negotiating position of owners of digital content such as films and music with digital platforms such as YouTube and Facebook.

“Today's vote ensures the right balance between the interests of all players — users, creators, authors, press — while putting in place proportionate obligations on online platforms,” the European Commission, which produced the first draft of the rules, said in a statement.

Helen Smith, executive chair of IMPALA, which represents independent record labels, declared the new rules a victory for creators of content.

“This is a landmark day for Europe's creators and citizens, and a significant step towards a fairer internet,” she said. “Platforms facilitate a unique relationship between artists and fans, and this will be given a boost as a result of this directive. It will have a ripple effect worldwide.”

Digital rights campaigners had called on lawmakers to drop part of the legislation that requires platforms to take down unauthorized content, saying it would force them to use crude content filters to guard against illegal content. These filters would automatically delete content for which users had not obtained explicit upload permission, stifling the creative use of digital content online.

Lawmakers rejected these arguments, put forward by Julia Reda, a member of Germany's pro-digital rights Pirate Party. Instead, they backed a range of exceptions that would allow content to be used for parody, quotation and other purposes.

Technology companies such as Google and Facebook had also opposed the copyright overhaul, stating that the changes would require them to build expensive content filters and stop linking to publications.

On March 26, Google issued a statement saying the EU's copyright reforms would produce legal uncertainty and hurt the bloc's creative and digital economies.

“The details matter, and we look forward to working with policymakers, publishers, creators and rights holders as EU member states move to implement these new rules,” the company said.

The new rules mean Google will have to pay fair compensation to publishers, artists and musicians.

Axel Voss, a conservative German lawmaker, said that claims that the new rules would stifle creativity were “complete exaggerations.”

The Commission said that the copyright rules would “protect freedom of expression” by setting “strong safeguards for users.” The use of existing works for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature as well as parody would be explicitly allowed, according to the Commission. “Memes and similar parody creations can be used freely,” it said.

The rules, which need the final approval of the EU's 28 national governments, will come into effect in approximately two years.

*****

Simon Taylor writes for Legal Week, the London-based ALM sibling publication of Entertainment Law & Finance.

 

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.