Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a decision that some believe may have massive implications for the release of the Mueller Report, the D.C. Circuit recently ruled that courts lack discretion to release documents provided to grand juries.
The split 2:1 decision dealt with an investigation from 1957, that of the disappearance of a political activist and Columbia University professor, Jesus de Galidez. Mr. Galindez's disappearance and death is the subject of an upcoming book by Stuart McKeever, a former attorney turned non-fiction writer. Mr. McKeever sought the documents from the initial grand jury investigation into Mr. Galindez's case for use in his next publication, and petitioned a lower court for their release. The release had been denied for being overly broad in its scope. In denying the request, however, the district court noted that it had the inherent authority to disclose these and other grand jury records in cases of historical significant. The Justice Department Appealed.
In ruling for the Justice Department, the D.C. Circuit asserted that courts are bound to maintain the secrecy of grand juries unless the federal rules of civil procedure explicitly allowed for disclosure. Cautioning against district courts making decisions based on their own interpretations of public policy and historical significance would “render the detailed list of exceptions merely precatory and impermissibly enable the to 'circumvent' or 'disregard' a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure”, wrote Judges Ginsburg and Katsas. Judge Srinivasan however, disagreed, citing precedent allowing for the release of Watergate documents based on the district court's exercise of discretion.
The ruling may come into the spotlight as groups lobby for the release of Special Counsel Mueller's report and the grand jury records from the investigation. While this particular decision may still be appealed, the decision raises obstacles for those who would like greater insight into the grand jury process.
— Surya Kundu, Mayer Brown
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.