Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Individuals and companies, small and large, often neglect to develop their security infrastructures until an attack occurs and it's too late. No one is spared from the interest of cybercriminals. Hackers are largely indiscriminate in their approach, choosing to cast a broad net to collect information and reviewing what they've plundered for value after the attack. It's not necessarily about you; it's about the numbers.
The risk is real and can happen to anyone — personally or professionally, outside or inside the legal market, including court reporters. The issue of digital security and privacy should be a paramount concern to modern court reporters just as it is to their attorney clients. Yet their biggest risk remains the same as everyone else's: believing it won't happen to them.
As guardians of the record, court reporters have access to a broad expanse of privileged and confidential information, and it is their individual responsibility to protect that data. The National Court Reporters Association Code of Professional Ethics states, “(Reporters must) preserve confidentially and ensure the security of information, oral or written, entrusted to the reporter by any parties in a proceeding.” This responsibility extends to work product transmitted or stored on their devices and any individuals employed in their professional practice (i.e., scopists and proofreaders).
Attorneys must be able to trust that the court reporters taking their depositions are following every possible measure to protect the security and privacy of the data they're handling. As independent contractors, court reporters can take several measures to minimize their risk of a data breach
The first step for anyone to protect him- or herself is to recognize that the human factor is the weakest link to a security infrastructure and then act to protect his or her digital security based on that fact. With the busy life of a court reporter, it's difficult to stay apprised of the latest security trends. The good news is that there are some core guidelines that are a sound starting point to develop a digital security toolkit and will help to mitigate risk and exposure. The following are several recommendations for how court reporters can protect themselves and their work product. Most of these tips are good practices for anyone with an online presence or handling sensitive data.
Turn on automatic updates and don't ignore them when prompted. Out-of-date software that hasn't been patched for security loopholes is often the point of entry for malicious attacks. Updating software can be annoying when trying finish a rough draft or other urgent client request, but it will be a lot more annoying when it is used against you!
As mentioned previously, make sure to set anti-virus protection software to automatically update or to accept any updates when prompted. Anti-virus protection is only doing its job properly if it is up-to-date to combat the latest cybersecurity threats.
Modern technology has advanced the profession of court reporting in significant ways over the past several decades, improving productivity with state-of-the-art stenographic equipment, transcription software and even the ability to deliver real-time transcripts. However, technological advancement also presents some risks.
As independent contractors, many court reporters choose to work through agencies that may offer enhanced technology and other security measures to help mitigate the risk of their data being compromised. For court reporters with these tools at their disposal, it's recommended they take full advantage of them.
Furthermore, because a potential breach's impact could be far ranging, attorneys have a vested interest in what their court reporters are doing to prevent it. Whether scheduling them directly or through an agency, attorneys and their firms should require evidence of the data security and privacy practices their court reporters employ.
*****
Andy Fredericks is the California Director of Operations for court reporting company Veritext Legal Solutions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.