Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Employees are increasingly using the cloud to access their personal email, documents, music and other data from anywhere at any time. They expect their employers' digital data will be similarly accessible. Beyond user experience, cost and complexity provide compelling reasons for moving your law firm's technology operations to cloud providers. This article discusses what to look for in a cloud service provider and other issues that will help determine if moving to the cloud is the right move for your firm.
The growth of technology has created many challenges for small- to medium-size businesses (SMBs), including law firms: continually upgrading hardware, staying abreast of the latest in security developments and hiring multiple staff members with different skills.
First, SMBs typically purchase server hardware with the expectation it will last for years. A year or two later, they discover they need to double the capacity of that system in order to meet technology needs. These costs are often not budgeted.
Additionally, security has moved from a simple firewall and anti-virus software to very expensive, hard-to-manage security systems, including log review and correlation (SIEM) systems, next-generation firewalls, host intrusion detection systems and sandboxing of all incoming files. Your IT department can no longer consist of one person wearing many hats, including maintaining infrastructure, ensuring data security and providing end-user support. To reduce this complexity and its associated costs, many firms are moving to the cloud.
Cloud services can be broken down into three major categories: software as a service (SaaS), platform as a service (PaaS) and infrastructure as a service (IaaS).
SaaS requires the least amount of technical knowledge and, as a result, allows for the least amount of IT administrative control. In the SaaS model, a cloud provider is responsible for everything from the hardware to the application. These types of services are all run primarily from a Web browser and require nothing to be downloaded or installed on the client's workstation. Examples of SaaS solutions include Dropbox, Salesforce, GoToMeeting and Office 365.
PaaS allows for more control but requires more technical knowledge than SaaS solutions. PaaS cloud solutions take care of the hardware and the operating system, allowing the user to focus on the applications. This is an ideal solution for application developers, who don't need knowledge of the underlying OS or hardware. Examples of PaaS solutions are Force.com, Apache Stratos and OpenShift.
IaaS requires the greatest amount of technical knowledge and grants administrators the most control. IaaS cloud providers are responsible for the underlying hardware or infrastructure through a host of virtual devices, including firewalls, networks and virtual servers and workstations. The company is responsible for managing the OS and the applications. This is the most flexible cloud-computing model and is highly scalable. Examples of IaaS are Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Compute Engine.
Security considerations are still paramount when migrating to a cloud solution. Maintaining good security and operational practices is a critical and nonnegotiable factor. In fact, these policies, standards and procedures are more important than ever to ensure that you are appropriately protecting your cloud implementation. Since cloud solutions are Internet accessible, if they are not appropriately secured, malicious actors can sometimes get in more easily than if the equipment is on your own premises.
When an IT service provider proposes that you use a cloud system implemented by that vendor, it's critical you also implement a vendor risk management plan (VRMP) so you can make sure your managed service provider is following appropriate security procedures to protect your data. A VRMP will also let you assess whether the cloud solution you are considering is appropriately secure as well. And, finally, it is important you have a business continuity plan in place so your employees and your managed service provider know what to do if your cloud system fails, suffers a hacking attack or has otherwise been rendered unavailable.
Moving to the cloud by yourself is not a simple process, and any organization should carefully consider the pros and cons of such a shift. Determining if moving to the cloud is right for your organization can be broken down into several steps:
Migrating IT services to a client service provider (CSP) benefits law firms by reducing their technology infrastructure's physical footprint in their offices, including built-in redundancy, easy scalability with better physical security and access to advanced security features. Ultimately, this all results in lower IT capital expenditures.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.