Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Committee for Environmentally Sound Development v. Amsterdam Avenue Redevelopment Associates Supreme Ct., N.Y. Cty, 1/17/19 (Perry, J.).
Community groups brought an article 78 proceeding challenging a determination by the Board of Standards and Appeals upholding issuance of a building permit for a 55-story tower at 200 Amsterdam Avenue. The court granted the petition, holding that the parcel on which the partially-built tower sits is not a zoning lot within the meaning of the New York City Zoning Resolution.
Developer assembled a parcel consisting of portions of various tax lots to create a 39-sided lot. Developer sought a building permit for the tower, contending that the lot constituted a zoning lot within the meaning of section 12-10 of the Zoning Resolution. Developer relied on a 1978 memo by the Acting Commissioner of the Department of Buildings (the Minkin Memo) . The Minkin Memo interpreted the zoning resolution to permit a zoning lot consisting of one or more “tax lots or parts of tax lots.” In 2017, the Department of Buildings issued a building permit. Community groups appeals to the Board of Standards and Appeals. A majority of the City Council, the Manhattan Borough President, the City Comptroller, and a variety of other groups supported the appeal. DOB presented a letter reversing its position and concluding that the Minkin memo had been incorrect, but seeking affirmance of its determination because of general reliance on the Minkin memo over a 40-year period. BSA upheld DOB's grant of the permit, and community groups brought this article 78 proceeding.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.