Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Edwards v. Walsh NYLJ 2/22/19, p. 28, col. 2 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In prospective purchaser's action against real estate broker for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, prospective purchaser appealed from Supreme Court's denial of his summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division modified to grant summary judgment on the fraud and fiduciary duty claims, but affirmed denial of summary judgment on purchaser's attempt to impose a constructive trust on the disputed property.
Maureen Walsh, a licensed broker, and Walsh Properties, Inc., a brokerage firm, represented prospective purchaser in his attempt to buy the subject real property in Queens. When Walsh transmitted prospective purchaser's offer to the property owner, Walsh also transmitted her own offer for the same property. The two offers were for the same price, but Walsh's personal offer included a down payment that was twice the size of plaintiff purchaser's down payment. She did not inform prospective purchaser of her offer or of the differential terms. Property owner accepted Walsh's offer. Prospective purchaser then brought this action for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. As remedies, he sought specific performance and imposition of a constructive trust. Supreme Court denied prospective purchaser's motion for summary judgment, prompting appeal.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.