Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A Georgia appeals court has upheld a trial court's decision to compel a commercial property owner to convey its previously-rented premises to the former tenant — later purchaser in possession — in accordance with the lease's purchase option, despite the fact that no money changed hands before the end of the option term. Siarah Atlanta Hwy, LLC v. New Era Ventures, LLC, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 238 (Ga. App. 5th Div. 5/1/2019).
Commercial landlord Siarah Atlanta Hwy, LLC leased a portion of its commercial property in Forsyth County, GA, to New Era Ventures, LLC, on May 1, 2015. The initial term of the lease was for 10 years, but the landlord retained the right to terminate the lease “for any reason whatsoever, by providing [New Era] with thirty (30) days written notice.”
Another section of the lease provided New Era with a purchase option, for which the tenant paid $175,000. The lease's purchase option stated:
31.1. Purchase Option. PROVIDED TENANT IS NOT IN DEFAULT AND HAS LEASED THE PROPERTY CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE DATE HEREOF UNTIL SUCH DATE, LANDLORD GRANTS TO TENANT, AFTER NINE (9) MONTHS FROM THE COMMENCEMENT DATE HEREOF, AND EXPIRING Forty-eight (48) MONTHS FROM THE COMMENCEMENT DATE HEREOF, ONLY (the “Option [*3] Period”), THE OPTION TO PURCHASE FROM LANDLORD THE REAL ESTATE OF WHICH THE PREMISES IS PART AND WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT B. TENANT MAY EXERCISE THE OPTION BY PROVIDING WRITTEN NOTICE TO LANDLORD AT LEAST NINETY (90) DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF CLOSING (the “Option Event”).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.