Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Co-ops & Condominiums
Merger Doctrine Precludes Unit Owner's Action Against Sponsor
Von Ancken v. 7 East 14 LLC NYLJ 4/8/19, p. 18, col. 1 AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In co-op unit owner's action against sponsor for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and fraud, unit owner appealed from Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the merger doctrine precluded breach of contract claims and that unit owner could not establish reasonable reliance on any misrepresentations.
The listing for unit owner's apartment was accompanied by a floor plan, prepared by sponsor, which stated that the unit was “ ~1,966 ” square feet when, in fact, the unit was approximately 1,495 square feet. Unit owner contends that the floor plan was incorporated by reference into the offering plan, which was, in turn incorporated by reference into the purchase agreement. Based on the misrepresentation in the listing, unit owner brought this action for breach of the purchase contract, for misrepresentation and fraud, and for violations of the Martin Act. Supreme Court dismissed the complaint.
In affirming, the Appellate Division first rejected the breach of contract claim on two grounds: 1) the listing was not identified in any of the purchase documents and was therefore not incorporated by reference; and 2) the purchase agreement itself provided that sponsor was making no representations and that the unit was purchased as is with the buyer's obligation to inspect the premises to determine actual determinations. The court then noted that because the unit owner had the opportunity to measure the apartment, they could not reasonably have relied on any misrepresentation by sponsor. Finally, the court concluded that the type of misrepresentation involved in this case is not the type of deceptive act covered by the Martin Act.
|This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.