Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Von Ancken v. 7 East 14 LLC NYLJ 4/8/19, p. 18, col. 1 AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In co-op unit owner's action against sponsor for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and fraud, unit owner appealed from Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the merger doctrine precluded breach of contract claims and that unit owner could not establish reasonable reliance on any misrepresentations.
The listing for unit owner's apartment was accompanied by a floor plan, prepared by sponsor, which stated that the unit was “ ~1,966 ” square feet when, in fact, the unit was approximately 1,495 square feet. Unit owner contends that the floor plan was incorporated by reference into the offering plan, which was, in turn incorporated by reference into the purchase agreement. Based on the misrepresentation in the listing, unit owner brought this action for breach of the purchase contract, for misrepresentation and fraud, and for violations of the Martin Act. Supreme Court dismissed the complaint.
In affirming, the Appellate Division first rejected the breach of contract claim on two grounds: 1) the listing was not identified in any of the purchase documents and was therefore not incorporated by reference; and 2) the purchase agreement itself provided that sponsor was making no representations and that the unit was purchased as is with the buyer's obligation to inspect the premises to determine actual determinations. The court then noted that because the unit owner had the opportunity to measure the apartment, they could not reasonably have relied on any misrepresentation by sponsor. Finally, the court concluded that the type of misrepresentation involved in this case is not the type of deceptive act covered by the Martin Act.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.