Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Matter of Sagaponack Ventures LLC v. Board of Trustees NYLJ 4/5/19, p. 27, col. 1 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In landowner's article 78 proceeding challenging denial of a site plan application, landowner appealed from Supreme Court's denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the Board of Trustees had not abused its discretion.
Landowner owns a 43.5 acre waterfront parcel. In 2004, landowner, under a different corporate name, applied to build four single-family residences on the parcel, three on the oceanfront portion and the fourth on the northwestern portion of the property, In 2008, the board conditionally approved a site plan that relocated the fourth house from the northwestern portion to another area. Landowner abandoned that site plan. In 2013, landowner submitted another site plan application to build four homes, largely in the same location as the original application, but abandoned the application when the board made it clear that it would compare the application with the 2008 conditional approval. Landowner then submitted the instant application to build a 13,000 square foot house on the northwestern portion of the parcel. The board rejected the application, concluding that the northwestern portion was not suitable for development. Landowner brought this article 78 proceeding. When Supreme Court denied the petition, landowner appealed.
In affirming, the Appellate Division concluded that the board had considered the factors set forth in the village code governing site plan applications. In particular, the board had concluded that development of the northwestern portion would contribute to the loss of agricultural soil, would have a negative impact on future subdivision of the property, and would negatively affect the vistas of farmland areas. As a result, the board's decision was not illegal, arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.