Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We are now awash in predictions of an impending economic downturn. Economists are predicting that sometime in 2020, the current boom will end. A boom that after 10 long years has returned the AmLaw averages to their inflation-adjusted 2008 numbers.
Recalling that Will Rogers once remarked that economists have accurately predicted 10 of the last eight recessions, I wonder what law firm management is waiting for. Why wait for a downturn to improve professional and administrative operations, policies and procedures? When is the best time to identify, discuss and design performance improvement measures? When you have the time, the resources, and clear heads or are in the midst of a financial crisis when survival is the only thing on your mind?
This article focuses on what a firm can do now that will improve future firm economics regardless of what the future may hold. I have identified three areas that offer the great opportunity for improving a law firms' economics and better positioning them for whatever the future may bring.
Let's explore each opportunity and how best to achieve the goal of improving professional and administrative operations.
Law firms have significant numbers of administrative support staff. The individual who performs the annual performance reviews of these employees is dependent upon their role within the firm. Administrative assistants (secretaries) are usually reviewed by the attorneys for whom they work. Staff in other departments (accounting, human resources (HR), IT, etc.) are usually evaluated by their respective managers and reviewed by either the Chief Operations Officer (COO) or other member of the firm's management. Raises are usually set during the budgeting process (2%-3%) and most, if not all employees get what is called a “peanut butter raise” — money is spread around to all employees with little if any distinction among the staff.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.