Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
City of Long Beach v. Sun NLF Partnership NYLJ 5/17/19, p. 29, col. 4 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In a condemnation proceeding, condemnor and condemnee cross-appealed from an award of attorney's fees in the sum of $831,303.22, of expert fees in the amount of $65,100, and of costs in an amount of $2,133.90. The Appellate Division modified to increase the award of attorney's fees to $1,366,250, and otherwise affirmed.
Condemnor initially offered condemnee $2,080,000 as compensation for the taking of real property. Condemnee then retained counsel on a contingency fee basis, where counsel would receive 20% of the first 500,000 of the excess over the city's initial award, and 15% of the balance. Four years after the initial offer, the city offered to pay $6,335,000 as compensation, and made an advance payment in that amount. Condemnee litigated the value of the premises, and Supreme Court determined that $11.8 million constituted just compensation. Condemnee then sought attorney's fees in the amount of $1,956.888 based on the contingency fee arrangement, together with expert fees and costs and disbursements. Supreme Court concluded that the expert fees and costs and disbursements were reasonable, but applied the contingency fee arrangement to the city's second offer of $6,335,000 rather than to the initial offer. As a result, Supreme Court awarded fees of $831,303.22. Both parties appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.