Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If orange is indeed the new black, then privacy might be the new cybersecurity. In just over a year since GDPR Day (May 25, 2018), privacy by design has made privacy as a profession one of the fastest growing and hottest verticals in and outside of the legal job market. Just as cybersecurity jobs are touted as having the highest demand yet lowest supply of talent in the American ecosystem, privacy is quickly becoming a field of increasing potential for talent in tertiary disciplines such as security, e-discovery, information governance, legal or compliance to find reinvention as well as greater vertical and financial mobility.
Few global legal phenomena in recent decades can compare to the sweeping impact the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation has had on big and small businesses alike, both domestic and abroad. GDPR has simultaneously been a job stimulus and an inflection point in how seriously society intends to govern our cultural, geopolitical and social identities as consumers. While U.S. law on data privacy is notably different and currently lacks federal regulation, a company's posture on data privacy has become vital to corporate brand identity — and arguably survival — in a changing global economy. Growth and maintenance of GDPR programs, fragmented updates in domestic privacy regulations, the increasing standardization and acceptance of training and education and an evolving American corporate commitment to consumer transparency around data collection will all alter the landscape of the privacy job market in the coming years. What we call and consider privacy today will enlarge and expand from this early origin, but for the near future, the impact will unquestionably mean more jobs.
What do those jobs entail? Who competes for those jobs? What is the mindset of the hiring managers when evaluating talent? How can someone transition into the space? Over the last half decade, TRU Staffing Partners has represented and continues to represent thousands of professionals and hundreds of opportunities in privacy. The following findings are from day-to-day talent assessment, staffing fulfillment, executive-level interviewing, collaborative job requisition creation and market intelligence and aim to capture the current state and predict the future of the privacy job market in the United States.
There are more people who self-identify as privacy professionals than one might think. The 2019 Global Privacy Summit hosted by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) this April had well over 4,000 attendees, and IAPP membership has soared from roughly 36,000 members to an astounding 50,000+ since GDPR Day 2018. The IAPP plays a key role in the maintenance and professionalization of the privacy field. IAPP certifications are the gold standard for training and certification in privacy (CIPP, CIPM, CIPT, FIP, PLS). The IAPP also releases a compelling salary survey every two years. Here are some quick key takeaways from the 2019 report regarding compensation and education that resonate as real and true:
Salaries over the last few years have certainly gone up for midlevel hires in privacy roles, and that is where most of the hiring occurs right now. Rewind to 2014 through 2017 and the volume of CPO or partner-level opportunities was quadruple what is available in 2019. Over the last several years, companies have hired or elevated individuals into executive-level leadership roles, and now those professionals are building teams. That does not mean the window of opportunity for a CPO-type role has evaporated, but it does mean the volume of those jobs has and will continue to diminish. This shift in hiring toward midlevel talent — often thought of as a senior associate within law firms or the manager/director level within corporations and consulting firms — will ultimately mean more jobs, but with significantly lower pay than CPOs. For the duration of 2019, the demand will remain high in these areas on the org chart.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?