Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In July 2019, Microsoft Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary Microsoft Magyarorszag Kft. (Microsoft Hungary) agreed to pay a combined $25 million in criminal and civil penalties to resolve U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations into Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations in Hungary, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Thailand.
Without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, Microsoft consented to a cease-and-desist order and disgorgement and pre-judgment interest of approximately $16.5 million as part of the settlement. Microsoft Hungary will pay a criminal penalty of over $8.5 million and also entered into a three-year non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ.
According to the SEC and DOJ, in Hungary, from at least 2013 to 2015, Microsoft Hungary secured approximately $13.7 million in business as a result of making improper payments to government officials in connection with various licensing transactions and service engagements for Hungarian government agencies. In certain foreign countries, including Hungary, Microsoft does not enter into contracts directly with its end customers, but sells software licenses via distributors or third party resellers who bid for the opportunity to sell Microsoft licenses to government customers. In this context, additional funds were secured under the guise of excessive discounts said to be necessary to conclude deals with local resellers. A senior executive of Microsoft Hungary approved such discounts, and false justifications were provided to Microsoft's global centralized "Business Desk" for their further endorsement. Instead of being passed onto government end customers that included Hungary's National Tax and Customs Administration (NAV) and Hungary's National Police (ORFK), the savings were used for corrupt purposes. The DOJ's Statement of Facts includes further examples where Microsoft Hungary Managers obtained discount approvals from the Business Desk after the government agency had already accepted a higher price.
Microsoft Hungary also made a number of payments to third party subcontractors in connection with service engagements for government customers including NAV, ORFK and the Hungarian Office for Education (OFI), where there was little or no evidence of services being provided. In relation to OFI, Microsoft Hungary was paid approx. $3.5 million for consulting services that it then subcontracted to a third party entity, who in turn engaged an existing OFI employee as the consultant. No due diligence was conducted on the third party or government official, whose identity was falsified in timekeeping records.
In Saudi Arabia, from 2012 to 2014, employees at Microsoft's wholly-owned subsidiary Microsoft Arabia made over $440,000 in improper payments into a slush fund maintained by two of Microsoft's vendors relating to travel expenses for government employees and gifts including furniture, laptops, tablets and other equipment for government agencies. The vendors made payments at the direction of Microsoft Arabia's employees and were paid a commission for acting as the conduit between the company and government officials.
In Thailand, from 2012 to 2015, Microsoft's wholly-owned local subsidiary Microsoft Thailand Ltd also provided improper travel expenses and gifts via third party vendors and resellers to both government officials and employees of non-government banking customers, at the same time that the company was engaged in securing business with those government agencies and end customers. A slush fund for these payments was established and concealed as relating to legitimate training expenses for end customers on Microsoft software.
Finally, in Turkey in 2014, executives at Microsoft's wholly-owned local subsidiary Microsoft Bilgisayar Yazilim Hizmetleri Limited Sirketi (Microsoft Turkey) approved a steep discount in a tender for Turkey's Ministry of Culture, with work directed by an unauthorized third party "system integrator". In fact, there was no evidence that the third party had provided any services or that any further discount had been passed on to the government end customer.
Microsoft and Microsoft Hungary received remediation and cooperation credit as part of the settlement. Microsoft has since strengthened its internal compliance program, taken disciplinary action against employees and terminated a number of Hungarian local licensing partners. The company has also implemented new discount transparency and approval requirements and has developed a data analytics system to assist in identifying higher-risk transactions. Microsoft's cooperation efforts included making regular factual presentations to authorities as it conducted its own internal investigation and voluntarily producing and translating relevant documents.
— Juliet Gunev, Mayer Brown
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.