Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

8th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Lawsuit Attacking Approved Bankruptcy Sale

By Andrew C. Kassner and Joseph N. Argentina Jr. 
October 01, 2019

Sales of substantially all of a debtor's assets are commonplace in corporate Chapter 11 bankruptcies. In many cases, the proposed sale is the primary reason the case is filed. The sale is supervised and approved by the Bankruptcy Court. Purchasers desire to know that if the sale is consummated, they will be protected from subsequent attacks on the sale and the sale process. If court-approved bankruptcy sales are protected from subsequent attacks, presumably more bidders will participate, resulting in greater returns for the estates and creditors. Issues surrounding the finality of a bankruptcy sale were recently reviewed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in In re Veg Liquidation, (f/k/a Allens, Inc.), Case No. 18-1786 (July 26, 2019).

The Sale and the Side Deal

The debtor in this case was Allens, Inc., an Arkansas food canning enterprise. Allens filed a Chapter 11 case in October 2013. After obtaining bankruptcy court approval for bidding and sale procedures for sale of substantially all of Allens' assets, the debtor named Seneca Foods Corp. as the stalking horse bidder. A stalking horse bid acts as an opening bid. If additional bids are submitted, an auction is held. If not, the stalking horse bid is submitted to the court for approval. The debtor accepts the highest or otherwise best bid for the assets being sold, usually after consultation with its professional advisers and the creditors' committee, lenders and others.

According to the opinion, the debtor and its advisers valued the Seneca bid at $117 million. Sager Creek Acquisition Corp., an entity formed by a group of Allens' second lienholders, submitted a bid. The final adjusted sale price of the Sager Creek bid was "just under $125 million." The debtor selected Sager Creek as the winning bidder, and the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the sale. The order was not appealed and the sale closed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.