Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a case alleging non-payment of legal fees, the Texas Court of Appeals affirmed the partial denial of a lawyer's motion to dismiss counter- and cross-claims filed by former client Matthew Knowles and his company, Music World Properties. Lang v. Knowles, 01-18-00268-CV. The Lang Ferrer law firm sued Knowles and Music World for alleged non-payment of $49,120 in legal fees. The causes of action include, among others, breach of contract, fraud and unjust enrichment. Knowles responded with a series of allegations against the firm, including unfair debt collection practices, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract. Knowles charged that Lang Ferrer falsely claimed he had auctioned off memorabilia of his former management clients Destiny's Child and his daughter Beyoncé, to avoid paying creditors. Attorney Shannon Lang filed a motion under the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA), Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §27.003 et seq., the state's anti-SLAPP statute, to dismiss the cross-claims against her. Lang argued her legal fees claims were "based on or related to her 'exercise of the right to petition'" under the First Amendment. The defendants in turn filed a long list of accusations, such as claiming the lawyers "charg[ed] excessive fees for the[] sparse legal work," that "nothing meaningful was done" on behalf of Knowles and his company "after the legal invoices of the [Law F]irm were disputed." The Harris County Texas Court denied Lang's motion to dismiss, except for Music World's claim of unfair debt collection practices. Lang filed an interlocutory appeal. In affirming the lower court, the state appeals court noted: "Lang argues that Knowles and Music World's legal action, i.e., cross-claims, is based on the petition and [fees] Demand Letter, and the republication of those documents by media outlets. However, the Demand Letter was sent by an attorney representing 'Lang Ferrer, PLLC,' i.e., the Law Firm. Similarly, the original petition in this case was filed by the Law Firm as the only plaintiff. There is no indication in either the Demand Letter or the original petition that either were sent on behalf of Lang, individually, as opposed to the Law Firm. … In other words, Lang, in her individual capacity, has not exercised her right to petition. Nor, has she, as alleged, exercised her right to free speech based on republication of the petition and Demand Letter in blogs and media outlets." The appeals court continued: "And the claims brought against Lang and Ferrer for 'misconduct' and 'negligence' are in connection with the Law Firm's previous representation of Knowles and Music World, not the Law Firm's Demand Letter or original petition in this instant case. As such, Lang has not proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the TCPA applies to the claims at issue."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.