Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District, Cuyahoga County, recently affirmed a trial court's award of attorney fees to a commercial tenant because, although the tenant did not prevail on each and every aspect of the multiple claims, it did prevail on the main counts of the lawsuit. Simbo Properties Inc. v. M8 Realty LLC, 2019-Ohio-3091 (7/1/201).
Simbo Properties Inc. (Simbo) entered into a 18-month commercial lease with tenant M8 Realty LLC (M8) in December 2012. One of the lease's provisions stated: "If a lawsuit is filed with respect to this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to collect all reasonable attorney's fees and costs." During the tenancy, Simbo claimed that M8 violated several provisions of the lease, leading the landlord to file a four-count complaint against M8 in January 2016. The landlord's complaint sought rent of approximately $150,000, real estate taxes of approximately $32,000, property damage compensation of approximately $30,000, and other non-specified damages. The tenant counterclaimed. After motions and trial, all liabilities were determined, with tenant M8 prevailing as to the rent, but landlord Simbo prevailing as to two of its claims and tenant's counterclaim.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.