Lawyers Win Contingency Fee Fight Against Estate of Blues Icon's Son

There have also been disputes over rights to the two existing photographs of Johnson as well as over who was his rightful heir. The latest Robert Johnson-related court decision involves a contingency fee agreement originally entered into by a law firm hired by Johnson's son, who died in 2015. The case offers an example of what rights counsel may gain from such an arrangement following the death of the signatory client. Estate of Johnson v. Kitchens Law Firm P.A., 2018-CA-00260-COA.

In 1991, Claud L. Johnson hired the Mississippi law firm Kitchens & Ellis to obtain a court determination that he was Robert Johnson's legal heir. The parties' contingency fee agreement, which didn't include a term length, stated in part that Claud assigned to the firm "causes of action or rights in the amount of forty percent (40%) of any and all sums of money or other benefits which [the firm] may recover or obtain for me by virtue of, or arising from, my biological relationship to the late Robert Johnson, as aforesaid, including, but not limited to, past, present, and future royalties, commissions, profits, and other benefits and/or revenues of every kind and character which have been derived, or may in the future be derived, from the sale, lease, rental or other marketing of sound or video recordings, sheet music, books, pictures, musical instruments, or devices, live or recorded performances and/or other productions and reproductions of the music and other works of Robert Johnson, including any and all use of the name Robert Johnson, whether such performances, products or productions, if any, were made by Robert Johnson or by others, or by Robert Johnson and others."