Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Something to Remember: The Flexibility of Chapter 11 in Retail Situations

By Christopher T. Greco, Spencer A. Winters and Derek I. Hunter
October 01, 2019

In the era of the retail apocalypse — where name-brand retailers are closing all or large portions of their stores — the successful going-concern sale of mall-based retailer Things Remembered stands as a testament to the benefits of the Chapter 11 process and the commercial and practical approach that must be utilized in large retail Chapter 11 cases. In the face of increasing pressure from online retailers, and declining foot-traffic in malls and other brick-and-mortar locations, distressed retailers like Things Remembered need to act expeditiously to execute going-concern transactions if they are going to survive the market disruption.

In the Things Remembered case, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, with Judge Kevin Gross presiding, recognized the business rationale for the company's expedited timeline. At the company's request, the court appointed a consumer privacy ombudsman on the first day of the case, and subsequently on shortened notice approved a process that paved the way for a sale in 30 days. Without this expedited timeline — and the cooperative and constructive approach taken by the company's lenders, the official creditors' committee, the U.S. Trustee, landlords, and other parties in interest — Things Remembered would likely have liquidated. And with it, thousands of employees would be without jobs and yet another retailer would fall victim to the times. This case demonstrates that going-concern retail sales are possible to save businesses, even in the current retail climate, if debtors can articulate a sufficient business need for speed.

The Business

Things Remembered is a 53-year-old business that sells personalized gifts such as jewelry, drinkware, kitchen and home accessories, and business-recognition gifts through two main channels — stores and direct website sales. At the time of its Chapter 11 filing, Things Remembered employed over 4,000 employees and had over $140 million in debt. It operated approximately 400 locations in shopping malls across 43 states, with an additional 19 locations in Canada.

A confluence of factors contributed to the company's need to commence its Chapter 11 case, including the macroeconomic factors impacting retailers and certain other microeconomic factors, all of which culminated in a liquidity crisis by December 2018, when Things Remembered faced inaccessible inventory, tightening trade credit, and winter holiday sales below historical numbers. As a struggling mall-based retailer facing a liquidity crisis, Things Remembered faced the real prospect of a full-scale liquidation. The jobs of thousands of Things Remembered employees were in serious peril. To plan for this prospect, Things Remembered took the novel step of pre-funding severance payments for its rank-and-file employees to demonstrate its commitment to their well-being.

Prepetition Marketing Process

Even while preparing for the worst, Things Remembered worked with its advisers to test the market. These robust efforts yielded only a handful of offers to buy the business as a going-concern. More specifically, the company received two written proposals in early January 2019 to acquire Things Remembered's direct business — it's e-commerce and business-to-business operations — but no physical store locations. A transaction that only saved the direct business would mean that all of the company's approximately 400 stores would close, resulting in job losses for thousands.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?