Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
More Than a Recitation of Hooke's Law Needed for Patent Protection
On Oct. 3, 2019, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Dyk, Moore, and Taranto issued a decision in American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, No. 2018-1763 (Fed. Cir. 2019). Judges Dyk and Taranto filed the majority opinion, and Judge Moore filed a dissenting opinion. The Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, finding that the claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,774,911 ("the '911 patent") were unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §101.
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. (AAM) sued Neapco Holdings LLC and Neapco Drivelines LLC (collectively, Neapco) for infringement of the '911 patent. See, id. at 2. The '911 patent is generally directed to "a method for manufacturing driveline propeller shafts ("propshafts") with liners that are designed to 'attenuat[e] … vibrations transmitted through a shaft assembly.'" Id. at 3 (citing '911 patent, col. 1, ll. 6-7). The vibrations of a propshaft cause undesirable noise, and various prior art references attempted to dampen the vibrations. See, id. at 3-4.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.