Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Kuzmich et al. v 50 Murray Street Acquisition LLC, 34 N.Y. 3d 84, the Court of Appeals held that apartments in buildings receiving tax benefits under Real Property Tax Law (RPTL §421-g) are not eligible for luxury deregulation under the Rent Stabilization Law (RSL), unlike most other rent-stabilized apartments. To appreciate the importance and consequences of this decision, one must understand the history of RPTL §421-g.
In 1993, lower Manhattan was in sharp decline. Following the World Trade Center bombing, vacancy rates in commercial buildings soared and their assessed values plummeted. Many commercial buildings in lower Manhattan were outdated and unfit to accommodate growing and changing industries. The nightly exodus of office workers leaving to return to their homes left lower Manhattan a virtual ghost town after business hours.
To turn the tide, then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani proposed the Lower Manhattan Revitalization Plan (the LMRP). A key component of the LMRP was RPTL §421‑g, which provided tax benefits to commercial building owners that converted either all or part of their buildings into residential apartments. The purpose of the 421‑g program was to remove unused commercial space from the market and create a thriving, 24-hour community in lower Manhattan where people both live and work.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.