Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The day the mine collapsed in the Atacama Desert, the world held its breath. Across time zones and over months, we watched in simultaneous disbelief and hopefulness as rescuers worked to reach the men trapped below. As humanity does in all major crises — energy plant explosions, oil spills, commercial fires — we shared in awe and concern at the first responders working to save lives and contain the damages. In these emergencies, what most don't recognize is that the events span far beyond first response on the ground. Behind the scenes, and long after the news cameras stop rolling, a separate set of teams are triggered, preparing for and managing the extensive legal and investigative processes that follow.
Under the intense emotion and stress inherent in crisis circumstances, legal teams orchestrate short term e-discovery to uncover who knew/knows what relating to the crisis and events leading up to and immediately following it. They assess the breadth of damage and injury in the moment as the crisis unfolds, alongside launching longer-term investigations into what caused the accident and any potential negligence or wrongdoing that occurred. Getting to the facts quickly is critical to prepare for litigation, government investigations and potential criminal charges, and to expedite restitution for victims.
Our teams have worked on a number of crisis e-discovery matters around the world, supporting clients through the lifecycle of complex investigations and litigation that result from these disastrous and often tragic events. In most cases, crisis e-discovery projects are highly likely to involve large data volumes (often double digit terabytes) and span many involved parties (e.g., a committee of plaintiffs of affected parties, governmental agencies, foreign governments, states' attorneys general, etc.). They require tremendous manpower and broad expertise in all practice areas, including data collection, processing, project management, advanced analytics, case management, foreign language review and production. Timelines are often extraordinarily tight, especially in government investigations in which counsel is preparing for congressional testimony and other regulator requests for data.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?