Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the entertainment industry, it can take years for actors, musicians and others to reach a point where their efforts begin bringing in a notable return. If and when these types of clients begin to make a consistently significant income, one method that deserves consideration for protecting the hard-earned pay is to organize a loan-out corporation.
From a legal standpoint, these corporations are essentially identical to single-member limited liability companies (LLCs) or sole-shareholder corporations. The term "loan-out corporation" is generally used in the entertainment industry and reflects that these companies — typically consisting of one owner — allow entertainers to "loan out" their services into independent contract relationships with third parties. Substantial tax benefits and asset protections may make these types of enterprises attractive once an entertainer begins taking in a more sizable income and is subjected to higher personal income taxes.
Let's say a film and TV actor is beginning to receive a steady stream of well-paying work. Once his or her income begins to increase to around $100,000 per year, the entertainer's counsel should broach the idea of a loan-out corporation. This is a general figure, but it is around that income level that the potential tax savings begin to outweigh the initial costs and annual fees of operating a corporation.
Another set of factors for legal and financial advisers to note before suggesting a loan-out corporation is the state under which the corporation will be created, as certain states have varying fees. Costs of living are also a consideration, as they may affect at what income level it is most beneficial to begin the process.
An entertainer who reaches the rare heights of fame and starts earning a multimillion-dollar annual income might have multiple enterprises and companies, but the loan-out corporation remains the method for contracting that talent to film studios, production companies, record companies and other third parties.
Following are some fundamental benefits of operating via a loan-out corporation.
Forming a loan-out corporation is no different than forming a corporation or LLC. While the entertainer is focused on creating art, touring or shooting a television show, this is the pivotal time when their attorney steps in to form and structure the new business. There are multiple filing requirements, such as obtaining a tax ID number, drafting the bylaws or operating document, and a number of other procedural steps to complete depending on the type of business entity being formed.
These details do not go away after the business is formed. There remain annual operating expenses and often filings to maintain the entity, and if it is not properly documented and consistently used in the proper fashion, it may draw the unwanted attention of the IRS. The IRS recognizes that entertainers are creating these companies to save on taxes, so it will look for any reason to declare one a tax avoidance mechanism.
*****
Maxwell Briskman Stanfield is an attorney at Meyer, Unkovic & Scott in Pittsburgh, PA. His practice includes corporate and business law. He has a wide variety of experience in the entertainment industry. He can be reached at [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?