Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Courts

By Juliet Gunev
December 02, 2019
|

Maryland's Largest Ever Ponzi-Scheme: Kevin Merrill Sentenced to 22 Years in Prison for $396 Million Consumer Debt Fraud

On October 10, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Kevin Merrill, 54, was sentenced to 22 years in federal prison following his guilty plea to charges of conspiracy and wire fraud in connection with a $396 million investment fraud scheme offering high returns on consumer debt products. He was ordered to pay at least $190 million in restitution by U.S. District Court Judge Richard D. Bennett, with the full amount of the victim's losses to be repaid still to be determined. An order of forfeiture was made, with the exact amount also still to be determined. Merrill's two co-conspirators and his wife have also plead guilty to charges relating to their roles in the scheme and subsequent obstruction of justice.

According to Merrill's plea agreement, the scheme, which operated from 2013 through September 2018, involved the use of fictitious sales agreements and other falsified documents, including quarterly reports and tax returns, provided by a co-conspirator Jay Ledford, 55, to induce investors to invest in consumer debt portfolios with Merrill's companies: Delmarva Capital and Global Credit Recovery. Merrill and Ledford, a certified accountant with offices in Texas, had been long term friends since meeting in 1999 before commencing the scheme in 2013. In the first year of the scheme, Merrill raised over $4 million from investors, far exceeding the $186,000 brought in by Ledford, at which point they agreed that Merrill would assume the "front man" sales role given his superior sales ability. Ledford continued to supply Merrill with the fictitious documents needed to lend credibility to the transactions, eventually bringing in a third co-conspirator in 2017, Cameron Jezierski, 28, to assist.

Merrill, assisted by Ledford and Jezierski, falsely represented to investors that he would use their money to purchase debt portfolios of commensurate value to the investment made before collecting on the debts or "flipping" the portfolios for profit to other third-party debt buyers. In fact, in most cases Merrill did not use the investments to buy any portfolios, did not manage, sell or collect on portfolios, and did not pay net profits back to investors as claimed. The vast majority of the purported "profits" returned to investors were paid from funds provided by other investors. Investors who requested additional due diligence were provided with false collection reports, false bank statements and false merchant account statements.

In one example, detailed in Merrill's plea agreement, he was introduced to a group of investors known as the "Colorado Group." A representative for the Colorado Group made a number of requests for documentation, including tax returns and a letter from Merrill's certified accountant to confirm there were no unpaid taxes, liens or deficiencies. As the true documents were inconsistent with Merrill's claims to the Colorado Group, he had Ledford create a new tax return with an adjusted gross income and a false letter stating full compliance with all taxation filings. When Ledford emailed the falsified tax return to Merrill he replied "Perfection — Thanks my Shady friend." After the Colorado Group agreed to invest, Merrill forwarded the email to Ledford and added the message "Boom." At other times Merrill and Ledford made efforts to conceal the amount of fraudulent proceeds from their activities even from each other. Ledford, for example, would overstate the purchase price to Merrill for a portfolio so that he could keep the additional mark-up for himself. Merrill, in turn, did not always tell Ledford how much he received from investors, in one case misrepresenting over $2.6 million in new monies from Singaporean investors as non-existent "mixed credit card portfolios" to his co-conspirator.

The scheme ultimately took in over $396 million from investors located in Maryland, Washington, DC, Virginia, Colorado, Texas, Chicago, New York, and elsewhere, with the individual victims including doctors, lawyers, accountants, small business owners, restauranteurs, construction contractors, retirees, bankers, talent agents, professional athletes, and financial advisors. At the time of their arrest, the co-conspirators were also in the process of fraudulently obtaining a further $260 million from investors. The funds were used for the co-conspirators personal benefit. Merrill used the money to support a lavish lifestyle, purchasing a home in Florida, purchasing and/or renovating five homes in Maryland, and funding the acquisition of luxury cars, artwork, sports memorabilia, jewelry, a share in a private plane, life insurance and gambling monies.

As further detailed in his plea agreement, Merrill had met with the FBI while the scheme was ongoing and provided false information and documents to investigating agents. After his arrest, Merrill also attempted to obstruct justice by causing his wife to conceal assets from the court-appointed receiver.

Following their guilty pleas, Judge Bennett sentenced Ledford to 14 years and Jezierski to 24 months in prison respectively for their roles in the scheme. Merrill's wife, Amanda Merrill, 30, has plead guilty to conspiracy to remove and conceal assets in violation of court orders, and is due to be sentenced in January 2020.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has an ongoing parallel civil action in this matter.

The criminal case is USA v. Merrill et al., in the in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland (case number 1:18-cr-00465); and the parallel civil case is SEC v. Merrill et al., also in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland (case number 1:18-cv-02844)

— Juliet Gunev, Mayer Brown

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.