Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
High-street retail is going through an adjustment period — much like all retail asset classes. Both institutional and private investors are looking carefully at market fundamentals and property fundamentals, but for properties that check the right boxes, there are still active buyers. In some cases, even bidding wars.
"Street retail properties are going through a level of adjustment and evolution similar to what we are seeing in other categories of retail," Carlos Lopez, EVP at Hanley Investment Group, tells Commercial Leasing Law & Strategy's ALM sibling GlobeSt.com. "In ideal, select markets, prominent, street retail properties continue to attract buyers. In today's market, whether an institutional buyer or private capital, buyers and lenders are carefully looking at the real estate fundamentals of a property, whether it is a high-street property, grocery-anchored shopping center, power center, a strip center or a single-tenant retail asset."
Hanley has seen the trend on some recent deals. It closed a high-street deal on Robertson in Beverly Hills with a 28% vacancy. However, the market fundamentals told a compelling story that resulted in multiple offers. "The investment included the opportunity to lease-up a 2,425-square-foot, endcap space on a high-visibility corner located less than one mile from the Golden Triangle," Lopez says. "Despite the 28% vacancy, Hanley Investment Group generated multiple, qualified all-cash offers within the first several weeks of marketing the 8,745-square-foot multi-tenant retail property. The sale price was $8 million, representing $920 per square feet."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.