Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Matter of Franklin Street Realty Corp. v. NYC Environmental Control Board NYLJ 12/18/2019, p. 25, col. 1 Court of Appeals (Opinion by Wilson, J.)
Four corporations in which a lawyer holds an ownership interest appealed from the Appellate Division's confirmation of a determination imposing fines on the corporation for violating New York City's outdoor advertising sign regulations. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that when the corporations posted signs advertising the lawyer's business, they were making signs "available to others" within the meaning of the city's Administrative Code.
Lawyer Ciafone has an ownership interest in four corporations which, collectively, own five small residential or mixed-use buildings in Brooklyn and Queens. Affixed to each of the five buildings is signage advertising Ciafone's law practice. The Department of Buildings cited the corporations for violations of the city's Zoning Resolution and Administrative Code. The Department enhanced the fines on the ground that the corporations were outdoor advertising companies within the meaning of the administrative code. The corporations appealed the fines and the hearing examiners dismissed most of the violations, but the Environmental Control Board disagreed, concluding that the corporations were making advertising space available to "others." Ciafone brought an article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, but a divided Appellate Division affirmed. Ciafone appealed.
In affirming, the Court of Appeals focused on the code's definition of outdoor advertising business: [t]he business of selling, leasing, marketing, managing, or otherwise either directly or indirectly making space on signs situated on buildings and premises within the city of New York available to others for advertising purposes …." The Code held that the corporations were entities distinct from Ciafone, even though Ciafone had an ownership interest in each corporation. As a result, Ciafone and his law practice were "others" within the meaning of the Code provision.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.