Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In commercial tenant's action for breach of contract, landlord appealed from the New York Supreme Court's judgment for tenant in the amount of $1,250,000. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that tenant was entitled to relief from its failure to timely exercise its renewal option. Laundry Management – N.3rd Street Inc. v. BFN Realty Associates, LLC, (AppDiv, Second Dept.) (memorandum opinion).
The tenant operated a laundry on the premises pursuant to a lease whose original term expired on Nov. 30, 2011. A lease rider gave the tenant the option to renew for two successive five-year periods so long as the tenant notified the landlord of its intent to exercise the renewal option no later than six months prior to the expiration of the then-existing term. The rider provided for notice in writing and delivered personally or by registered or certified mail or by a reputable overnight courier service. The landlord contended that tenant did not provide notice of an intent to renew until it received notice by certified mail in November 2011. The landlord rejected that notice as untimely, and tenant vacated the premises pursuant to court order in April 2012. The tenant then brought this action for breach of contract. At trial, one of tenant's principals testified that he had an employee hand deliver a renewal notice on May 30, 2011. Although the principal did not mention hand delivery in his earlier deposition or two sworn affidavits, and although landlord's representative testified that its office was closed that day, which was Memorial Day, the Supreme Court awarded tenant judgment for $1,250,000. The landlord appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.