Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

COVID-19: Companies, Trade Organizations Seek to Postpone CCPA Enforcement Date

By Dan Clark
April 01, 2020

Over 30 trade associations and companies co-signed a letter last month to California Attorney General Xavier Becerra asking him to push back the July 1 enforcement date for the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) due to the new coronavirus and a lack of clarity on the enforcement rules.

"The undersigned organizations employ millions of individuals who are faced with this crisis and are doing their best to manage their personal and professional lives in the face of uncertain times. Many companies have instituted mandatory work-from-home measures to limit community," the letter states.

United Parcel Service, Feld Entertainment Inc. and the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies are among the organizations that signed onto the letter.

An adviser to the attorney general said in an email to Corporate Counsel that the office is "mindful of the new reality created by COVID-19," but said the office still plans on enforcing the rules when they are finalized or on July 1, whichever comes first.

The letter states keeping that date would force companies to consider trade-offs "between decisions that are best for their employees and the world-at-large that may help the organizations they lead avoid costly and resource-intensive enforcement actions."

One issue is that many companies across the country are now requiring their employees to work from home. California Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered all employees to work from home. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo ordered companies to keep their employees home.

Michelle Hon Donovan, a partner at Duane Morris in San Francisco, said in an interview working from home is going to be a barrier to CCPA compliance.

"The big issue with many of my clients is that they're working from home and they're not as efficient," Donovan said.

Another issue cited in the letter is that companies will not have enough time to process rules because they continue to evolve. So far, Becerra has put out two revisions to the final regulations and has offered additional time for a comment period on those rules.

"It's not clear to me when we're going to see the final rules," Donovan said. "The comment period for the most recent version [didn't] end until March 27."

Donovan further said the last guidance, which was published on March 11, did not have any substantive changes from the first guidance published in January. She said while the employees in the California Office of the Attorney General are working from home, they also will not be at full capacity.

The letter says the third comment period will "delay the ultimate finalization of the rules until at least the end of April 2020, leaving very little time for entities to understand what is required of them under the final regulatory scheme and to build those requirements into their business processes."

*****

Dan Clark covers cybersecurity, legal operations and intellectual property for Cybersecurity Law & Strategy's ALM sibling Corporate Counsel. Follow him on Twitter @Danclarkalm.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.