Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Under the current circumstances, with most businesses required to be closed, the question arises as to what a commercial tenant's obligations are under the lease for its premises, most particularly with respect to rent. Can the tenant be relieved of, or does it have a defense to, the obligation to continue to pay rent? The short answer is possibly yes, but the situation is unprecedented and the answer may have to be determined in litigation.
With respect to the specific language in leases, the terms force majeure and "Acts of God" appear frequently in articles, newsletters and other publications as more and more businesses are looking for ways to freeze performance under their lease or perhaps terminate the lease altogether. A force majeure clause, which typically includes a reference to "Acts of God," is one that permits a party to a contract to be relieved from performing under that contract during a time when, due to some event outside of its reasonable control, the party's ability to perform is impeded, hindered or prevented. Generally speaking, the event must be one that can be neither anticipated nor controlled that may arise from acts of nature (e.g., floods, hurricanes) or of people (e.g., riots, strikes, war). There is a high bar for the invocation of a force majeure clause and whether or not it will apply will depend on the exact language of the lease and the law of the jurisdiction set forth in the lease. In the context of a commercial lease, if the lease contains a force majeure clause that specifically relieves performance in the event of a pandemic or similar event, a tenant may be permitted to close and stop paying rent. However, force majeure clauses often can be a frustrating dead end because: 1) courts apply them very strictly; 2) lease language frequently applies force majeure only to more limited circumstances such as delays in construction; 3) very few leases actually reference pandemics; and 4) many leases specifically do not permit force majeure to forgive payment of rent. If the lease in question originated with a landlord with multiple properties and a strong landlord lease, there is a good chance the force majeure clause will specifically not forgive the payment of rent. That landlord will expect the tenant to insure against that risk. In any event, if there is any chance of making a claim for rent relief under the force majeure clause, the tenant should examine the lease for landlord default provisions or the notice clause to be certain that appropriate notice of tenant's position is sent to the landlord. Otherwise there is a risk of tenant's rights being waived.
It is additionally essential that the tenant review its insurance provisions to determine if there is any coverage for interruption of business or rent insurance. Some leases require business interruption or rent insurance for the landlord's protection. Tenant can make that claim to its carrier.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.