Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
COVID-19 spurred an overnight surge in demand for work-from-home vendors — from videoconferencing companies to cloud service providers. This caused some companies to rush into service contracts without fully appreciating the privacy and cybersecurity risks involved.
Indeed, news of the meteoric rise and sudden scrutiny of some videoconferencing vendors shows just how important privacy and cybersecurity issues are when retaining a vendor. Even companies with long-standing contracts in place with these types of vendors may find those contracts outdated and in need of renegotiation in light of the growing demand for privacy legislation.
To consider privacy and cybersecurity appropriately when entering into, or renegotiating, vendor contracts, businesses should answer the following questions during the vendor negotiation process:
Each question is explained in greater detail below.
To start, businesses should understand the depth of access the vendor will have to personal information or other sensitive information, how the vendor will use that information, and whether the vendor will transfer that information to any third parties. Vendors oftentimes default to giving themselves wide latitude with the personal information they process, which can trigger legal obligations for the companies using their services. Businesses should review their vendor contracts and vendors' privacy policies closely and consult with their information security personnel to identify inconsistencies and limit access and use to only that which is appropriate under the circumstances. They should then ensure the vendor contract accurately reflects their understanding of the vendor's use of personal information.
Next, businesses should ask whether employing the vendor triggers any obligations under data privacy laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) or the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.